{"id":67555,"date":"2006-05-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-14T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/14\/bpj-essaye-darranger-les-bidons\/"},"modified":"2006-05-14T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-05-14T00:00:00","slug":"bpj-essaye-darranger-les-bidons","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/14\/bpj-essaye-darranger-les-bidons\/","title":{"rendered":"BPJ essaye d’arranger les bidons"},"content":{"rendered":"

On conna\u00eet bien notre excellent ami Bruce P. Jackson (BPJ<\/a>). On dit qu’il n’est pas pour rien dans la pr\u00e9paration de l’affaire de Vilnius<\/a> et dans le discours qui marqua la chose (discours de Dick Cheney, tr\u00e8s style n\u00e9o-Guerre froide, qui s’inspire des id\u00e9es n\u00e9o-conservatrices dont BPJ est si proche, rassemblement enthousiaste de quelques petits amis d’Europe de l’Est que BPJ conna\u00eet si bien<\/a>).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tMais les choses vont vite. Entre-temps, et vraiment tr\u00e8s nettement depuis Vilnius, les Russes font savoir qu’ils ne sont pas contents du tout et qu’ils ont les moyens pour que la chose soit entendue avec le plus grand s\u00e9rieux. Bref, on commence \u00e0 savoir, notamment du c\u00f4t\u00e9 de BPJ et des amis, que la Russie est redevenue un pays puissant et qu’elle n’a pas du tout aim\u00e9 le discours de Vilnius. Il se dit par cons\u00e9quent que certains des pays amis de BPJ et voisins de la Russie commencent \u00e0 trouver l’aventure provocatrice un peu trop provocatrice. Certains l’ont fait savoir \u00e0 BPJ.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tAinsi explique-t-on les r\u00e9actions de BPJ \u00e0 des questions du Guardian<\/a> sur le th\u00e8me : \u00ab The Russian bear is back and this time it’s gas-powered, Petrodollars give Putin weight on world stage.<\/em> \u00bb BPJ fait dans le style nuanc\u00e9, complice, applaudissant au d\u00e9bat d’id\u00e9es (ou \u00e0 la bataille des id\u00e9es) avec une Russie qui sait se faire entendre aujourd’hui, tout en confirmant tout le bien qu’il pense du formidable discours de Cheney. Bref, tout va bien les amis et soyons tout de m\u00eame un peu plus aimables avec Poutine qui commence \u00e0 peser son poids.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tVoici ce que le Guardian<\/em> nous rapporte des remarques de BPJ : \u00ab Bruce Jackson, an influential neo-con lobbyist on Russia, said: \u00ab It’s a difficult time now for the Russia romantics. The people who over-invested in this are in intellectual and political trouble right now.<\/em> (…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb The Russian response <\/em>[to Cheney’s speech] has been to warn of a new cold war. This seems an over-reaction but the frostiness does suggest what Mr Jackson calls the onset of a soft war. He welcomes it. There’s nothing wrong with a battle of ideas, he says. It’s a soft power competition. It’s desirable.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Mr Jackson sketches three fronts on the new battlefield of ideas and values between Russia and the west: Our institutions versus their Potemkin institutions, free markets versus their coercive state monopolies, and our democracy versus their managed democracy. What we don’t want is militarised competition.<\/em> (…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Mr Jackson also identifies the Caspian basin and the Black Sea region as the cockpit of the tussle between Russia and the west, a battle of ideas that is also a fight for markets and energy security.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 14 mai 2006 \u00e0 12H37<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

On conna\u00eet bien notre excellent ami Bruce P. Jackson (BPJ). On dit qu’il n’est pas pour rien dans la pr\u00e9paration de l’affaire de Vilnius et dans le discours qui marqua la chose (discours de Dick Cheney, tr\u00e8s style n\u00e9o-Guerre froide, qui s’inspire des id\u00e9es n\u00e9o-conservatrices dont BPJ est si proche, rassemblement enthousiaste de quelques petits… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4781,1294,3169,916,2730,5351],"class_list":["post-67555","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bpj","tag-cheney","tag-jackson","tag-poutine","tag-russie","tag-vilnius"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67555","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67555"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67555\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67555"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67555"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67555"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}