{"id":67556,"date":"2006-05-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-14T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/14\/et-pourquoi-pas-un-porte-avions-otan-americain-of-course\/"},"modified":"2006-05-14T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-05-14T00:00:00","slug":"et-pourquoi-pas-un-porte-avions-otan-americain-of-course","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/14\/et-pourquoi-pas-un-porte-avions-otan-americain-of-course\/","title":{"rendered":"Et pourquoi pas un porte-avions OTAN? (am\u00e9ricain, <em>of course<\/em>)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La derni\u00e8re trouvaille de la bo\u00eete \u00e0 id\u00e9es qu&rsquo;est le Congr\u00e8s US pour renforcer la d\u00e9fense du Monde libre contre les menaces qui le pressent vient du d\u00e9put\u00e9 Duncan Hunter qui <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=1482\" class=\"gen\">n&rsquo;est pas n&rsquo;importe qui<\/a>. En plus d&rsquo;\u00eatre un ami du d\u00e9put\u00e9 Randy Cunningham, et, comme tel, toujours susceptible d&rsquo;\u00eatre <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2249\" class=\"gen\">impliqu\u00e9<\/a> dans le scandale \u00e9ponyme comme on dit, Hunter est le pr\u00e9sident de la toute puissante House Armed Forces Commission contr\u00f4lant pour la Chambre le budget du Pentagone ($512,7 milliards pour FY2007, propos\u00e9 par la Chambre).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tSelon <em> Aerospace Daily &#038; Defense Report <\/em> en date du 15 mai, Hunter propose que le porte-avions USS <em>John-Kennedy<\/em>, qui va \u00eatre d\u00e9commissionn\u00e9 pour raisons de restriction budg\u00e9taire, soit confi\u00e9 \u00e0 l&rsquo;OTAN qui en ferait son premier porte-avions : \u00ab <em>The chairman of the House Armed Services Committee is suggesting NATO take over the USS John F. Kennedy aircraft carrier, which the U.S. Navy and the Bush administration want to retire early for budget reasons. The move would keep the flattop active to some degree while providing an incentive for NATO allies to further fund and develop their own defense capabilities, Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.) told Capitol Hill reporters May 11.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCette int\u00e9ressante initiative devrait angoisser les amis les plus atlantistes de l&rsquo;OTAN, ceux qui applaudissent l&rsquo;Am\u00e9rique et ne d\u00e9boursent gu\u00e8re pour leur d\u00e9fense. Bien s\u00fbr, on imagine le sch\u00e9ma que Hunter pourrait avoir en t\u00eate : vendre le JFK \u00e0 l&rsquo;OTAN et le garder int\u00e9gr\u00e9 dans l&rsquo;U.S. Navy, car qui mieux que cette marine sait faire op\u00e9rer cette unit\u00e9, et qui sinon elle est habilit\u00e9e \u00e0 conna\u00eetre tous les secrets-d\u00e9fense de cette unit\u00e9? Le processus pourrait se g\u00e9n\u00e9raliser, l&rsquo;OTAN devenant <em>de facto<\/em> un contributeur au budget de la d\u00e9fense des Etats-Unis.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tQuant aux Fran\u00e7ais, ils auraient pu y penser pour le <em>Cl\u00e9menceau<\/em>, cela aurait d\u00e9tendu l&rsquo;atmosph\u00e8re.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 14 mai 2006 \u00e0 12H48<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La derni\u00e8re trouvaille de la bo\u00eete \u00e0 id\u00e9es qu&rsquo;est le Congr\u00e8s US pour renforcer la d\u00e9fense du Monde libre contre les menaces qui le pressent vient du d\u00e9put\u00e9 Duncan Hunter qui n&rsquo;est pas n&rsquo;importe qui. En plus d&rsquo;\u00eatre un ami du d\u00e9put\u00e9 Randy Cunningham, et, comme tel, toujours susceptible d&rsquo;\u00eatre impliqu\u00e9 dans le scandale \u00e9ponyme&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3285,826,3961,1356,584,3704],"class_list":["post-67556","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-congres","tag-hunter","tag-john","tag-kennedy","tag-otan","tag-porte-avions"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67556","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67556"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67556\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67556"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67556"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67556"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}