{"id":67560,"date":"2006-05-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-15T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/15\/la-guerre-pentagone-congres-a-donc-bien-commence-et-lenjeu-est-bien-le-jsf\/"},"modified":"2006-05-15T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-05-15T00:00:00","slug":"la-guerre-pentagone-congres-a-donc-bien-commence-et-lenjeu-est-bien-le-jsf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/15\/la-guerre-pentagone-congres-a-donc-bien-commence-et-lenjeu-est-bien-le-jsf\/","title":{"rendered":"La guerre Pentagone-Congr\u00e8s a donc bien commenc\u00e9, et l&rsquo;enjeu est bien le JSF"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Apr\u00e8s l&rsquo;attaque de <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2687\" class=\"gen\">John McCain<\/a> contre le programme JSF, qui devrait aboutir \u00e0 un d\u00e9lai substantiel dans le programme (deux ans sans doute), le Pentagone a imm\u00e9diatement ripost\u00e9 comme on le laissait pr\u00e9voir. Cette riposte \u00e0 ce stade du processus l\u00e9gislatif indique l&rsquo;importance que le Pentagone attache \u00e0 l&rsquo;initiative McCain. Le Pentagone estime qu&rsquo;il est en danger de perdre le contr\u00f4le du programme au profit du Congr\u00e8s. (Mais le programme JSF est-il encore contr\u00f4l\u00e9 par le Pentagone et\/ou par quiconque ? C&rsquo;est une autre histoire.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa riposte du Pentagone est venue sous la forme d&rsquo;une interview que Ken Krieg, U.S. Defense Under-Secretary, a donn\u00e9 \u00e0 <a href=\"http:\/\/today.reuters.com\/business\/newsArticle.aspx?type=basicIndustries&#038;storyID=nN09343925\" class=\"gen\">Reuters<\/a> le 9 mai. Krieg critique les prises de position du Congr\u00e8s et laisse entendre qu&rsquo;elles peuvent interf\u00e9rer sur les n\u00e9gociations en cours avec les partenaires internationaux du programme.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>A congressional mandate to slow Lockheed Martin Corp.&rsquo;s $276.5 billion F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program could pose risks for suppliers and international partners who need the airplane to replace aging fighters, a top Pentagon official told Reuters. <D There are lots of risks, U.S. Defense Undersecretary Ken Krieg said in an interview. You have breaks in supplier capabilities, Krieg said. Meanwhile, Britain and the other international partners involved in building the new plane are counting on its arrival as scheduled, he said, adding, We sort of have replacements that we need to do too.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t(&#8230;)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Krieg said work on a new memorandum of understanding among the international partners was going relatively well. The goal was to finish the talks this summer, with the respective governments to approve the agreement by the end of the year. Asked if the proposed program delay could jeopardize those talks, Krieg said partner countries would have to decide if any schedule changes were material and make their own decisions. This is a multinational development program and so their views are important as we work the schedule issues, and as we work all the issues, he said.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 15 mai \u00e0 09H09<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Apr\u00e8s l&rsquo;attaque de John McCain contre le programme JSF, qui devrait aboutir \u00e0 un d\u00e9lai substantiel dans le programme (deux ans sans doute), le Pentagone a imm\u00e9diatement ripost\u00e9 comme on le laissait pr\u00e9voir. Cette riposte \u00e0 ce stade du processus l\u00e9gislatif indique l&rsquo;importance que le Pentagone attache \u00e0 l&rsquo;initiative McCain. Le Pentagone estime qu&rsquo;il est&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3285,250,4763,4063],"class_list":["post-67560","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-congres","tag-jsf","tag-krieg","tag-mccain"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67560","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67560"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67560\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67560"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67560"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67560"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}