{"id":67561,"date":"2006-05-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-15T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/15\/les-ecoutes-illegales-us-le-cas-de-qwest\/"},"modified":"2006-05-15T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-05-15T00:00:00","slug":"les-ecoutes-illegales-us-le-cas-de-qwest","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/15\/les-ecoutes-illegales-us-le-cas-de-qwest\/","title":{"rendered":"Les \u00e9coutes ill\u00e9gales US : le cas de QWest"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le programme d&rsquo;\u00e9coute ill\u00e9gale de la NSA mis \u00e0 jour par un article de <a href=\"http:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/news\/washington\/2006-05-10-nsa_x.htm\" class=\"gen\">USA Today<\/a> du 11 mai est totalement gigantesque et gargantuesque. Une source interrog\u00e9e par le quotidien d\u00e9clare notamment : \u00ab <em>It&rsquo;s the largest database ever assembled in the world, one person told USA Today. The program&rsquo;s goal is to create a database of every call ever made within the nation&rsquo;s borders, the person said.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tL&rsquo;argument de la Maison-Blanche est imp\u00e9ratif: la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale. C&rsquo;est un argument devant lequel, selon l&rsquo;administration, tous les autres imp\u00e9ratifs et arguments juridiques doivent \u00eatre \u00e9cart\u00e9s. Mais alors se pose, selon cette logique, le cas de QWest. Trois soci\u00e9t\u00e9s de t\u00e9l\u00e9communications US (AT&#038;T, Verizon et BellSouth) ont accept\u00e9 de communiquer \u00e0 la NSA leurs archives concernant les communications de 200 millions d&rsquo;Am\u00e9ricains. Egalement sollicit\u00e9e, QWest, une soci\u00e9t\u00e9 du Colorado qui administre les communications de 14 millions de personnes, a refus\u00e9, arguant de l&rsquo;ill\u00e9galit\u00e9 de la demande (selon Robert Parry, de <a href=\"http:\/\/www.consortiumnews.com\/2006\/051106.html\" class=\"gen\">ConsortiumNews<\/a> : \u00ab <em>Qwest, a Colorado-based company with about 14 million customers, refused to turn over its records to the government because there was no court order<\/em> \u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tQWest n&rsquo;a pas \u00e9t\u00e9 inqui\u00e9t\u00e9e. Cela signifie donc que son argument a \u00e9t\u00e9 jug\u00e9 juridiquement valable par la NSA, qui n&rsquo;a pas insist\u00e9. Dans ce cas, que vaut, juridiquement, l&rsquo;argument de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale qui doit prendre le pas sur tous les autres, qui est avanc\u00e9 par l&rsquo;administration? Le cas de QWest pourrait servir de base juridique solide pour des citoyens \u00e9cout\u00e9s qui voudraient attaquer le gouvernement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 15 mai 2006 \u00e0 09H30<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le programme d&rsquo;\u00e9coute ill\u00e9gale de la NSA mis \u00e0 jour par un article de USA Today du 11 mai est totalement gigantesque et gargantuesque. Une source interrog\u00e9e par le quotidien d\u00e9clare notamment : \u00ab It&rsquo;s the largest database ever assembled in the world, one person told USA Today. The program&rsquo;s goal is to create a&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4915,4916,2937,3871,5380,4205],"class_list":["post-67561","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-ecoutes","tag-illegales","tag-nationale","tag-nsa","tag-qwest","tag-securite"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67561","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67561"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67561\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67561"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67561"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67561"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}