17 mai<\/a>, la Garde Nationale elle-m\u00eame est tr\u00e8s d\u00e9favorable \u00e0 un contr\u00f4le f\u00e9d\u00e9ral.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00ab U.S. state-level National Guard leaders will fight any effort to place their forces under direct presidential control. The National Guard commanders are poised to carry out the Bush administration’s border-security plan to deploy thousands of troops to patrol the Mexican border, but they likely will fight any attempts to place the state-run units under the president’s control, CongressDaily reported Tuesday.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb Maintaining state control over Guard units allows governors to manage the strain on the force and determine which troops and equipment to send and for how long, Maj. Gen. Roger Lempke, president of the Adjutant Generals Association of the United States, told CongressDaily in comments published Tuesday. It gives us more flexibility in how we rotate them … the length of time, the training, said Lempke, who also serves as Nebraska’s Guard chief. We can tailor packages, if you will, to better meet the needs of the states where they’ll be.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb Historically, governors have maintained control of the National Guard during domestic deployments. Although there were indications the border security plan would not require the Guard to be brought under federal control, the administration tried and failed to federalize Guard units deployed to Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina last year.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 18 mai 2006 \u00e0 10H23<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
La d\u00e9cision de GW Bush de militariser la fronti\u00e8re mexicaine essentiellement \u00e0 l’aide d’unit\u00e9s de la Garde Nationale pose potentiellement un probl\u00e8me important : ces forces seront-elles ou non sous contr\u00f4le f\u00e9d\u00e9ral ? La Maison-Blanche (et le Pentagone) le voudrait, soi-disant pour l’efficacit\u00e9 du d\u00e9ploiement par l’interm\u00e9diaire d’un contr\u00f4le centralis\u00e9. Ces intentions sont per\u00e7ues avec… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5393,5217,2936,3330,5216,2937],"class_list":["post-67568","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-federal","tag-frontiere","tag-garde","tag-immigration","tag-latinos","tag-nationale"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67568","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67568"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67568\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67568"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67568"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67568"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}