{"id":67573,"date":"2006-05-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-19T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/19\/les-russes-sinquietent-dun-expensive-pleasure-qui-fait-saliver-le-pentagone\/"},"modified":"2006-05-19T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-05-19T00:00:00","slug":"les-russes-sinquietent-dun-expensive-pleasure-qui-fait-saliver-le-pentagone","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/19\/les-russes-sinquietent-dun-expensive-pleasure-qui-fait-saliver-le-pentagone\/","title":{"rendered":"Les Russes s&rsquo;inqui\u00e8tent d&rsquo;un \u201c<em>expensive pleasure<\/em>\u201d qui fait saliver le Pentagone"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>A deux reprises en huit jours, et par les voix les plus autoris\u00e9es, les Russes s&rsquo;inqui\u00e8tent des projets am\u00e9ricanistes en mati\u00e8re d&rsquo;armement anti-terroriste. Il s&rsquo;agit de l&rsquo;\u00e9trange id\u00e9e de transformer des ICBM (InterContinental Ballistic Missile) normalement charg\u00e9s de frappes nucl\u00e9aires strat\u00e9giques, en engins arm\u00e9s de t\u00eates conventionnelles destin\u00e9s \u00e0 frapper des objectifs terroristes transportant dans leurs poches arri\u00e8re gauche quelque arme de destruction massive \u00e9pouvantable. Les projets am\u00e9ricains concernent notamment des ICBM <em>Minutemen<\/em> III, \u00e0 $150 millions l&rsquo;exemplaire (dans les ann\u00e9es 1970), dont la mission serait d\u00e9sormais de frapper,  tr\u00e8s vite, on peut \u00eatre s\u00fbr,  un Ben Laden quelconque chevauchant sur son coursier dans les montagnes de l&rsquo;Afghanistan.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t&bull; Le 10 mai, Poutine d\u00e9clarait dans son <a href=\"http:\/\/fr.rian.ru\/russia\/20060510\/47941143.html\" class=\"gen\">message annuel<\/a> devant le Parlement : \u00ab <em>les projets d&rsquo;utilisation de missiles balistiques intercontinentaux \u00e0 ogive conventionnelle sont d\u00e9j\u00e0 examin\u00e9s par les experts. Le lancement d&rsquo;un tel missile peut provoquer une r\u00e9action inad\u00e9quate de toutes les puissances nucl\u00e9aires, y compris un v\u00e9ritable coup de r\u00e9torsion avec emploi des forces nucl\u00e9aires strat\u00e9giques.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t&bull; Selon une d\u00e9p\u00eache de Novosti, relay\u00e9e par <a href=\"http:\/\/www.spacewar.com\/reports\/Russian_Army_Chief_Warns_Over_Non_Nuclear_ICBMs.html<D\" class=\"gen\">Spacewar.com<\/a>, le chef d&rsquo;\u00e9tat-major g\u00e9n\u00e9ral russe, le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Youri Balouyevski a renouvel\u00e9 ce m\u00eame avertissement, en laissant percer, en plus de son inqui\u00e9tude \u00e9vidente, une certaine ironie stup\u00e9faite pour ce projet du Pentagone : \u00ab <em>This <\/em>[the use of non-nuclear ICBMs] <em>may trigger an irreversible reaction in countries with nuclear arsenals because they will be unable to identify the type of warhead on a ballistic missile and its target, he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The general&rsquo;s comment came following the United States&rsquo; declared intention to place non-nuclear warheads on its ICBMs. Our American colleagues say that they <\/em>[missiles] <em>can be used to kill bin Laden, he said, but suggested that this was not the best way to deal with the al-Qaeda leader and was an expensive pleasure.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 19 mai 2006 \u00e0 17H36<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A deux reprises en huit jours, et par les voix les plus autoris\u00e9es, les Russes s&rsquo;inqui\u00e8tent des projets am\u00e9ricanistes en mati\u00e8re d&rsquo;armement anti-terroriste. Il s&rsquo;agit de l&rsquo;\u00e9trange id\u00e9e de transformer des ICBM (InterContinental Ballistic Missile) normalement charg\u00e9s de frappes nucl\u00e9aires strat\u00e9giques, en engins arm\u00e9s de t\u00eates conventionnelles destin\u00e9s \u00e0 frapper des objectifs terroristes transportant dans&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5408,5407,5406,3194],"class_list":["post-67573","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-anti-terroriste","tag-conventionnel","tag-icbm","tag-pentagone"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67573","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67573"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67573\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67573"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67573"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67573"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}