{"id":67583,"date":"2006-05-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/23\/911-vrai-ou-pas-lamerique-divisee-en-deux-la-these-du-complot-nest-plus-marginale\/"},"modified":"2006-05-23T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-05-23T00:00:00","slug":"911-vrai-ou-pas-lamerique-divisee-en-deux-la-these-du-complot-nest-plus-marginale","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/23\/911-vrai-ou-pas-lamerique-divisee-en-deux-la-these-du-complot-nest-plus-marginale\/","title":{"rendered":"9\/11, vrai ou pas: l’Am\u00e9rique divis\u00e9e en deux, la th\u00e8se du \u201ccomplot\u201d n’est plus marginale"},"content":{"rendered":"

La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d’enqu\u00eate de sondage Zogby a interrog\u00e9 1.200 Am\u00e9ricains sur la question de l’attaque du 11 septembre 2001. L’enqu\u00eate officielle, qui n’a apport\u00e9 aucune modification essentielle \u00e0 la version officielle, est-elle satisfaisante ? Ou bien ? Voici les deux options, l’une positive, l’autre n\u00e9gative :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t• \u00ab The 9\/11 attacks were thoroughly investigated and that any speculation about US government involvement is nonsense.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t• \u00ab so many unanswered questions about 9\/11 remain that Congress or an International Tribunal should re-investigate the attacks, including whether any US government officials consciously allowed or helped facilitate their success<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tA la premi\u00e8re question, 47% r\u00e9pondent oui; \u00e0 la seconde, 45% r\u00e9pondent oui. L’Am\u00e9rique divis\u00e9e en deux sur cette question qui reste compl\u00e8tement pol\u00e9mique et continue \u00e0 peser sur la vie politique US, ce n’est pas rien.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tIl y a beaucoup de choses int\u00e9ressantes dans cette enqu\u00eate : citons le fait int\u00e9ressant du fractionnement par engagements politiques et par communaut\u00e9s (les hispanos<\/em> sont les plus sceptiques, tiens donc avec 67%) ; citons surtout le fait extr\u00eamement important que le doute sur l’attaque 9\/11 devient une fa\u00e7on de s’opposer \u00e0 l’establishment<\/em>, ce qui constitue a contrario<\/em> une institutionnalisation<\/strong> de l’hypoth\u00e8se du complot.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tSur ce dernier point : On ne peut plus aujourd’hui consid\u00e9rer que la th\u00e8se du complot, si largement ridiculis\u00e9e et m\u00e9pris\u00e9e, souvent sans autre raison que par dogmatisme de la pens\u00e9e, par une \u00e9crasante majorit\u00e9 de l’establishment<\/em> m\u00e9diatique, est l’expression d’une minorit\u00e9 marginale, donc disqualifi\u00e9e d’office selon les m\u00e9thodes habituelles du syst\u00e8me. C’est un \u00e9v\u00e9nement tr\u00e8s important. Le concr\u00e9tiser d’une fa\u00e7on statistique doit laisser des traces.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tVoici quelques mots de commentaire de RAW Story<\/a>, ce jour m\u00eame : \u00ab Not surprisingly, Republicans as a group were the most supportive of existing investigations, with 70% expressing their satisfaction — about the same percentage that has expressed approval of Bush’s performance in recent polls. Sixty-four percent of those earning over $75,000 were also skeptical of doubts about 9\/11. The groups most likely to want the attacks re-investigated were Hispanics at 67% and African-Americans at 64%.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Other groups also skewed one way or another, but with the majority position generally not above 58%. Overall, the breakdown on the question closely followed the usual political divisions in the country: Republicans vs. Democrats and independents, whites vs. minorities, the wealthier and better-educated vs. the poorer and less educated, people over fifty vs. those under fifty, men vs. women.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb This rough balance in opinions is itself a striking finding. It suggests that doubts about the officials accounts of 9\/11, far from representing an extreme fringe position, have become a standard component of anti-establishment attitudes.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb When asked specificially if they thought there had been a government coverup of evidence that contradicts the official story, the results were again not far from an even split, with 48% rejecting the idea of a deliberate coverup and 42% supporting it. Belief in a coverup was the majority position among Democrats, 18-29 year olds, and a few other groups.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDernier point, \u00e9galement du plus grand int\u00e9r\u00eat: c’est la premi\u00e8re enqu\u00eate sur ce sujet aux USA et elle pr\u00e9pare un s\u00e9minaire qui aura lieu en juin \u00e0 Chicago: 9\/11: Revealing the Truth, Reclaiming Our Future<\/em>. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 23 mai 2006 \u00e0 21H11<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La soci\u00e9t\u00e9 d’enqu\u00eate de sondage Zogby a interrog\u00e9 1.200 Am\u00e9ricains sur la question de l’attaque du 11 septembre 2001. L’enqu\u00eate officielle, qui n’a apport\u00e9 aucune modification essentielle \u00e0 la version officielle, est-elle satisfaisante ? Ou bien ? Voici les deux options, l’une positive, l’autre n\u00e9gative : • \u00ab The 9\/11 attacks were thoroughly investigated and… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4747,4926,4118],"class_list":["post-67583","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-9-11","tag-complot","tag-establishment"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67583","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67583"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67583\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67583"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67583"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67583"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}