{"id":67597,"date":"2006-05-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-05-28T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/28\/bdm-pentagonesques-en-europe-on-ne-se-bouscule-pas-au-portillon\/"},"modified":"2006-05-28T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-05-28T00:00:00","slug":"bdm-pentagonesques-en-europe-on-ne-se-bouscule-pas-au-portillon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/05\/28\/bdm-pentagonesques-en-europe-on-ne-se-bouscule-pas-au-portillon\/","title":{"rendered":"BDM pentagonesques en Europe : on ne se bouscule pas au portillon"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Ce que nous apprennent les deux textes joyeusement contradictoires  r\u00e9alit\u00e9 <em>versus<\/em> propagande,  recueillis par nous dans notre rubrique <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/choix.php?link_id=6568&#038;comm=1\" class=\"gen\">Nos choix comment\u00e9s<\/a>, c&rsquo;est que le nombre de pays europ\u00e9ens partisans d&rsquo;accueillir sur leur sol des stations anti-missiles du r\u00e9seau am\u00e9ricaniste BDM (Ballistic Defense Missiles) a fondu comme neige au soleil. En 2001, le Pentagone pointait sur ses tablettes : le Royaume-Uni sans aucun doute, l&rsquo;Italie et l&rsquo;Allemagne probablement, la Pologne sans consultation pr\u00e9alable n\u00e9cessaire, \u00e9ventuellement l&rsquo;un ou l&rsquo;autre de-ci de-l\u00e0. Le Pentagone estimait n&rsquo;avoir qu&rsquo;un seul embarras : celui du choix.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAujourd&rsquo;hui, on apprend, en passant, qu&rsquo;il semble bien qu&rsquo;il ne soit plus gu\u00e8re question du Royaume-Uni. C&rsquo;est la grande nouvelle. Sans fanfare ni trompettes, l&rsquo;hypoth\u00e8se d&rsquo;une station BDM au Royaume-Uni n&rsquo;est plus \u00e9voqu\u00e9e et les appr\u00e9ciations g\u00e9n\u00e9rales mettent les dirigeants britanniques dans le m\u00eame sac que les autres sceptiques europ\u00e9ens  (Andrew Brookes de l&rsquo;IISS, \u00e0 propos de la menace nord-cor\u00e9enne pour justifier le programme BDM : \u00ab <em>German politicians, French politicians and British politicians do not regard Pyongyang as about to launch anything in the foreseeable future at a European capital, they just don&rsquo;t<\/em> \u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl n&rsquo;y a gu\u00e8re, aujourd&rsquo;hui, qu&rsquo;un seul pays europ\u00e9en \u00e0 envisager l&rsquo;installation d&rsquo;une station BDM am\u00e9ricaniste sur son sol : l&rsquo;in\u00e9puisable et inalt\u00e9rable Pologne. Un des deux textes publi\u00e9s, celui qui nous pr\u00e9sente ce qui ne peut \u00eatre d\u00e9sign\u00e9 que comme le point de vue du Pentagone, pr\u00e9cise que les USA ont l&rsquo;intention de mettre sur la table du sommet de l&rsquo;OTAN, \u00e0 Riga en novembre, cette question de la participation europ\u00e9enne au r\u00e9seau BDM. La rencontre deviendrait des plus int\u00e9ressantes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 28 mai 2006 \u00e0 06H21<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ce que nous apprennent les deux textes joyeusement contradictoires r\u00e9alit\u00e9 versus propagande, recueillis par nous dans notre rubrique Nos choix comment\u00e9s, c&rsquo;est que le nombre de pays europ\u00e9ens partisans d&rsquo;accueillir sur leur sol des stations anti-missiles du r\u00e9seau am\u00e9ricaniste BDM (Ballistic Defense Missiles) a fondu comme neige au soleil. En 2001, le Pentagone pointait sur&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5433,398,584,2827,3747],"class_list":["post-67597","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bmd","tag-europe","tag-otan","tag-pologne","tag-propagande"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67597","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67597"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67597\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67597"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67597"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67597"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}