{"id":67640,"date":"2006-06-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-06-09T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/06\/09\/chronique-de-linculpabilite-courante\/"},"modified":"2006-06-09T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-06-09T00:00:00","slug":"chronique-de-linculpabilite-courante","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/06\/09\/chronique-de-linculpabilite-courante\/","title":{"rendered":"Chronique de l&rsquo;inculpabilit\u00e9 courante"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Pour entretenir la verve et la r\u00e9flexion de nos lecteurs, nous citons ci-apr\u00e8s deux exemples de comportement sugg\u00e9r\u00e9s par la particularit\u00e9 psychologique am\u00e9ricaniste que nous avons baptis\u00e9e du n\u00e9ologisme d&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2679\" class=\"gen\">inculpabilit\u00e9<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t&bull; Du d\u00e9put\u00e9 ukrainien Georgy Kryuchkov, pr\u00e9sident de la Fondation Europe-Ukraine Libre, dans un article (\u00ab <em>Why is Kiev breaking up with Russia?<\/em> \u00bb) qu&rsquo;il a publi\u00e9 sur le site de <a href=\"http:\/\/www.regnum.ru\/english\/652732.html\" class=\"gen\">Regnum<\/a>, le 8 juin (la phrase d\u00e9signant le caract\u00e8re m\u00eame d&rsquo;inculpabilit\u00e9 soulign\u00e9e par nous en gras) :  \u00ab <em>While commenting on the report of the Council on Foreign Relations (Russia&rsquo;s Wrong Direction: What the US Can and Should Do), well-known American politician Stephen Cohen says that the report applies dual cold war standards. To prove his words he refers to the situation in Ukraine.<\/em> <strong><em>He says that it is astonishing but they in the US say that Russia has no national interests in Ukraine, while the US has the right to do whatever it wants to make Ukraine join NATO.<\/em><\/strong> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t&bull; De l&rsquo;expert am\u00e9ricain en \u00e9nergie F. William Engdahl, dans un article (\u00ab <em>US outflanked in Eurasia energy politics<\/em> \u00bb), sur le site <a href=\"http:\/\/atimes.com\/atimes\/Global_Economy\/HF10Dj01.html\" class=\"gen\">atimes.com<\/a> en date du 10 juin: \u00ab <em>Curiously, Washington has repeatedly accused China of not playing by the rules, in terms of its oil politics, declaring that China is guilty of seeking to control energy at the source, as though that had not been US energy policy for the past century.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tOn notera que les analystes qui rapportent les anomalies de comportement dues \u00e0 l&rsquo;inculpabilit\u00e9 (sans identifier la chose pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment) soulignent toujours cette trouvaille d&rsquo;appr\u00e9ciations dubitatives (<em>astonishing<\/em>, <em>curiously<\/em>) marquant leur incompr\u00e9hension. Si l&rsquo;on s&rsquo;en tient \u00e0 la seule analyse des faits, les affirmations am\u00e9ricanistes sont si impudentes, si extravagantes par rapport \u00e0 cette r\u00e9alit\u00e9, qu&rsquo;on est d\u00e9contenanc\u00e9 qu&rsquo;elles soient ainsi exprim\u00e9es tant elles sont maladroites dans leurs effets. On devine bien, intuitivement dans ce cas, qu&rsquo;il ne s&rsquo;agit pas de propagande,  la ficelle serait bien trop grosse, bien trop impudente qu&rsquo;elle en serait contre-productive,  et d&rsquo;ailleurs elle l&rsquo;est si l&rsquo;on ne dispose pas de l&rsquo;explication de l&rsquo;inculpabilit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPlus pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment : pourquoi nier absurdement que la Russie ait des int\u00e9r\u00eats de s\u00e9curit\u00e9 nationale en Ukraine? C&rsquo;est irriter les Russes sans n\u00e9cessit\u00e9. Les agents am\u00e9ricanistes pourraient faire le m\u00eame travail de propagande et d&rsquo;agitation qu&rsquo;ils font en Ukraine sans que les officiels US aient \u00e0 avancer de telles sornettes qui les discr\u00e9ditent et mobilisent leurs concurrents et adversaires,  cas de la Russie actuellement. Cela serait bien plus efficace puisque l&rsquo;Ukraine serait entra\u00een\u00e9e dans le m\u00eame processus de d\u00e9stabilisation sans que la Russie puisse aussi clairement accuser les USA A moins que ces officiels ne croient vraiment \u00e0 leurs affirmations. Nous y sommes : c&rsquo;est l&rsquo;attitude caract\u00e9ristique de l&rsquo;inculpabilit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tBien s\u00fbr, m\u00eame explication pour la Chine qu&rsquo;on irrite en l&rsquo;accusant de faire ce que les Etats-Unis font depuis un si\u00e8cle. Est-ce bien utile? A moins que ces officiels, etc.  <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 9 juin 2006 \u00e0 17H01<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Pour entretenir la verve et la r\u00e9flexion de nos lecteurs, nous citons ci-apr\u00e8s deux exemples de comportement sugg\u00e9r\u00e9s par la particularit\u00e9 psychologique am\u00e9ricaniste que nous avons baptis\u00e9e du n\u00e9ologisme d&rsquo;inculpabilit\u00e9. &bull; Du d\u00e9put\u00e9 ukrainien Georgy Kryuchkov, pr\u00e9sident de la Fondation Europe-Ukraine Libre, dans un article (\u00ab Why is Kiev breaking up with Russia? \u00bb) qu&rsquo;il&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3977,3634,3600,2730,1296],"class_list":["post-67640","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-chine","tag-inculpabilite","tag-petrole","tag-russie","tag-ukraine"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67640","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67640"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67640\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67640"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67640"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67640"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}