{"id":67647,"date":"2006-06-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-06-12T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/06\/12\/bolton-a-t-il-son-propre-agenda\/"},"modified":"2006-06-12T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-06-12T00:00:00","slug":"bolton-a-t-il-son-propre-agenda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/06\/12\/bolton-a-t-il-son-propre-agenda\/","title":{"rendered":"Bolton a-t-il son propre agenda ?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Il ne faut surtout jamais d\u00e9sesp\u00e9rer de John Bolton, l’ambassadeur US \u00e0 l’ONU et politiquement situ\u00e9 \u00e0 l’extr\u00eame droite des n\u00e9o-conservateurs. Bolton n’a pas vraiment accept\u00e9 le tournant<\/a> de la diplomatie US, dans la mesure o\u00f9 ce tournant peut r\u00e9ellement \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme une d\u00e9faite<\/a> de la politique US et une mise en retrait de la politique d’attaque militaire contre l’Iran.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tPaul Craig Roberts estime aujourd’hui sur Antiwar.com<\/a> que Bolton \u00ab is using <\/em>[his UN] platform to push America into war with Iran<\/em> \u00bb. Roberts cite l’article du Financial Times<\/a> du 9 juin, o\u00f9 Bolton, interview\u00e9, clame hautement que l’accord avec l’Iran en train d’\u00eatre n\u00e9goci\u00e9 est vou\u00e9 \u00e0 l’\u00e9chec. Roberts \u00e9crit :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab In his remarks to the Financial Times, Bolton shows himself to be extremely disturbed by the prospect that the diplomatic efforts of Europe, Russia, and China could undermine the Bush Regime’s plan to attack Iran. Bolton is doing everything possible to make certain that there is no diplomatic solution.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tRoberts estime que les plans d’attaque restent compl\u00e8tement d’actualit\u00e9 et qu’ils sont aujourd’hui activement pouss\u00e9s par les n\u00e9o-conservateurs, apr\u00e8s quelques jours de d\u00e9sarroi<\/a>. La logique de Roberts conduit \u00e0 conclure que si les id\u00e9ologues extr\u00e9mistes parvenaient \u00e0 renverser la vapeur, une attaque contre l’Iran serait \u00e0 nouveau d’actualit\u00e9 et qu’elle comporterait certainement une composante nucl\u00e9aire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Nuking Iran is an essential part of the attack plan. The U.S. lacks the necessary conventional military force to invade and occupy Iran, but the use of nuclear weapons against Iran has a wider purpose. The neocons are determined not to have any more embarrassments, such as the Iraqi insurgency. By nuking Iran they intend to send a wider message that the U.S. will use every means at its disposal to ensure its hegemony. The neocons believe that the use of nukes will convince Arabs and the wider world that there is no recourse to accepting America’s will.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 12 juin 2006 \u00e0 07H56<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Il ne faut surtout jamais d\u00e9sesp\u00e9rer de John Bolton, l’ambassadeur US \u00e0 l’ONU et politiquement situ\u00e9 \u00e0 l’extr\u00eame droite des n\u00e9o-conservateurs. Bolton n’a pas vraiment accept\u00e9 le tournant de la diplomatie US, dans la mesure o\u00f9 ce tournant peut r\u00e9ellement \u00eatre consid\u00e9r\u00e9 comme une d\u00e9faite de la politique US et une mise en retrait de… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2870,1092,2773,1104,3004],"class_list":["post-67647","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-attaque","tag-bolton","tag-iran","tag-neocons","tag-nucleaire"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67647","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67647"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67647\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67647"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67647"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67647"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}