{"id":67707,"date":"2006-07-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-07-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/01\/antimissiles-us-reticences-polonaises\/"},"modified":"2006-07-01T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-07-01T00:00:00","slug":"antimissiles-us-reticences-polonaises","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/01\/antimissiles-us-reticences-polonaises\/","title":{"rendered":"Antimissiles US: r\u00e9ticences polonaises"},"content":{"rendered":"

Surprise ou pas ? Il s’av\u00e8re que les Polonais ne sont pas si enthousiastes qu’on pouvait le croire pour accueillir sur leur territoire une base am\u00e9ricaine de missiles antimissiles. C’est une surprise \u00e9galement pour les Am\u00e9ricains, qui pensent avec imp\u00e9tuosit\u00e9 que les pays Est europ\u00e9ens anciennement communistes, et les Polonais en particulier, leur sont aveugl\u00e9ment acquis. Par ailleurs, l’attitude polonaise rencontre certaines observations recueillies chez des diplomates Ouest europ\u00e9ens, notamment fran\u00e7ais, qui constatent que les Polonais commencent \u00e0 mesurer le poids des obligations entra\u00een\u00e9es par une all\u00e9geance aveugle aux USA, et \u00e0 envisager de tenter de prendre certaines distances.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLes r\u00e9ticences polonaises pour la proposition US sont d’autant plus marquantes qu’elles viennent du minist\u00e8re de la d\u00e9fense, pourtant men\u00e9 par un homme (le ministre Sikorski) qu’on jugeait acquis aux USA (Sikorski habitait Washington et pr\u00e9sidait l’American Enterpise Institute, le think tank<\/em> n\u00e9o-conservateur, avant de rentrer en Pologne pour devenir ministre).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tC’est une d\u00e9p\u00eache AFP, reprise par Defense News<\/a>, qui fait \u00e9tat de ces r\u00e9ticences, rapport\u00e9es par un quotidien polonais.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Poland is thinking twice before committing itself to hosting a U.S. anti-missile defense system on its territory, Polish deputy Defense Minister Stanislaw Koziej said. We’re not absolutely forced to accept this offer if we judge that it’s not advantageous for us, Koziej said, cited by the Dziennik daily Friday. We don’t have to have this installation on our territory if it doesn’t clearly serve to increase our security, Koziej added.<\/em> (…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Koziej said Poland was waiting for a concrete offer from the United States that will take into account the central European country’s needs and national interests.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tFor the moment Poland is not committing itself, he added. No final decision has been made.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 1er juillet 2006 \u00e0 04H46<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Surprise ou pas ? Il s’av\u00e8re que les Polonais ne sont pas si enthousiastes qu’on pouvait le croire pour accueillir sur leur territoire une base am\u00e9ricaine de missiles antimissiles. C’est une surprise \u00e9galement pour les Am\u00e9ricains, qui pensent avec imp\u00e9tuosit\u00e9 que les pays Est europ\u00e9ens anciennement communistes, et les Polonais en particulier, leur sont aveugl\u00e9ment… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4056,2827,5567,4862],"class_list":["post-67707","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-antimissiles","tag-pologne","tag-reticences","tag-sikorski"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67707","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67707"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67707\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67707"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67707"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67707"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}