{"id":67714,"date":"2006-07-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-07-03T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/03\/on-ne-prend-plus-de-gants-pour-les-consignes\/"},"modified":"2006-07-03T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-07-03T00:00:00","slug":"on-ne-prend-plus-de-gants-pour-les-consignes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/03\/on-ne-prend-plus-de-gants-pour-les-consignes\/","title":{"rendered":"On ne prend plus de gants pour les consignes"},"content":{"rendered":"

Un sondage sur le sentiment du public britannique vis-\u00e0-vis des USA publi\u00e9 aujourd’hui par le quotidien londonien The Daily Telegraph<\/a> (par ailleurs signal\u00e9 par un lecteur dans le Forum<\/a> de ce jour), salue la f\u00eate nationale des USA du 4 juillet. Dr\u00f4le de salut : le sondage montre une hostilit\u00e9 extr\u00eame du public britannique pour les Etats-Unis (\u00ab Britons have never had such a low opinion of the leadership of the United States, a YouGov poll shows<\/em> \u00bb, commente sobrement le Telegraph<\/em>).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tTous les r\u00e9sultats de ce sondage, qu’on trouve comment\u00e9s dans un article du professeur Anthony King (\u00e9galement dans The Telegraph<\/a>), donnent une image absolument catastrophique des Etats-Unis. Le sondage est au-dessus de tout soup\u00e7on : \u00ab YouGov elicited the views of 1,962 adults across Great Britain online between June 26 and 28. The data have been weighted to conform to the demographic profile of British adults as a whole. YouGov abides by the rules of the British Polling Council.<\/em> \u00bb (King).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCertains commentaires valent le d\u00e9placement et l’attention soutenue. On lira l’\u00e9ditorial du m\u00eame<\/a> Telegraph<\/em>, qu’on aurait tendance \u00e0 d\u00e9crire comme quelque part entre l’extr\u00eame de la propagande et les d\u00e9buts de la pathologie. Le titre nous donne l’avant-go\u00fbt qui importe : \u00ab To hate America is to hate mankind.<\/em> \u00bb (Lire aussi les commentaires de lecteurs qui saluent l’\u00e9dito : la polarisation des opinions est extraordinaire.) Jusqu’ici, l’anti-am\u00e9ricanisme \u00e9tait class\u00e9 dans la m\u00eame rubrique que l’anti-s\u00e9mitisme ; d\u00e9sormais, c’est une case \u00e0 part : c’est de l’anti-humanisme.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOn retiendra aussi le commentaire de l’ambassade des USA \u00e0 Londres, toujours dans le m\u00eame quotidien<\/a>, commentaire qui vaut bien un commentaire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe commentaire de l’ambassade :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab A spokesman for the American embassy said that the poll’s findings were contradicted by its own surveys. We question the judgment of anyone who asserts the world would be a better place with Saddam still terrorizing his own nation and threatening people well beyond Iraq’s borders.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb With respect to the poll’s assertions about American society, we bear some of the blame for not successfully communicating America’s extraordinary dynamism.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb But frankly, so do you [the British press].<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tCela revient \u00e0 dire que, si l’ambassade des USA n’a pas bien fait son travail de propagande, la presse britannique, frankly<\/em>, n’est pas \u00e0 f\u00e9liciter non plus. Dont acte. On t\u00e9l\u00e9phone aussit\u00f4t \u00e0 Rupert Murdoch.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tQuant \u00e0 vous, Britts<\/em>, sachez bien que l’ambassade s’interroge sur l’\u00e9quilibre de votre jugement et la sant\u00e9 de vos esprits. Il y a de quoi, Britts<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 3 juillet 2006 \u00e0 14H13<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Un sondage sur le sentiment du public britannique vis-\u00e0-vis des USA publi\u00e9 aujourd’hui par le quotidien londonien The Daily Telegraph (par ailleurs signal\u00e9 par un lecteur dans le Forum de ce jour), salue la f\u00eate nationale des USA du 4 juillet. Dr\u00f4le de salut : le sondage montre une hostilit\u00e9 extr\u00eame du public britannique pour… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3493,3561,4875,3494,4199,2758],"class_list":["post-67714","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-3493","tag-anti-americanisme","tag-britannique","tag-juillet","tag-telegraph","tag-uk"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67714","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67714"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67714\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67714"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67714"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67714"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}