{"id":67720,"date":"2006-07-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-07-06T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/06\/specialite-americaniste-le-perfect-storm\/"},"modified":"2006-07-06T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-07-06T00:00:00","slug":"specialite-americaniste-le-perfect-storm","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/06\/specialite-americaniste-le-perfect-storm\/","title":{"rendered":"Sp\u00e9cialit\u00e9 am\u00e9ricaniste: le \u201cperfect storm<\/em>\u201d"},"content":{"rendered":"

La derni\u00e8re foucade du Nord-Cor\u00e9en Kim junior semble avoir plong\u00e9 l’establishment<\/em> washingtonien dans la plus compl\u00e8te d\u00e9pression. C’est ce qu’on conclut d’un impressionnant article (A Driven President Faces a World of Crises<\/em>) que publie le Washington Post<\/a>, o\u00f9 les uns et les autres s’emploient \u00e0 dresser le bilan tr\u00e8s sombre d’une non-politique \u00e9trang\u00e8re volant au gr\u00e9 des flots d\u00e9cha\u00een\u00e9s de ce qu’ils nomment a perfect storm<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t• Madeleine Albright, ancienne Secr\u00e9taire d’\u00c9tat de Clinton, emploie effectivement l’expression, en ajoutant pour la compr\u00e9hension du monstre la notion d’uni-dimensionnalisme : \u00ab Albright said yesterday that the United States now faces the perfect storm in foreign policy. The U.S. is not as unilateral as it is uni-dimensional, she said in an interview. We have not been paying attention to a lot of these issues. . . . Afghanistan is out of control because not enough attention was paid to it.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t• Richard N. Hass, autre sp\u00e9cialiste de politique ext\u00e9rieure, ajoute une perspective int\u00e9ressante que nous partageons compl\u00e8tement: GW va laisser \u00e0 son successeur une situation absolument chaotique, ce qui contredit la th\u00e8se pleine d’esp\u00e9rance des Europ\u00e9ens utopistes et pro-am\u00e9ricanistes attendant avec fi\u00e8vre le d\u00e9part de GW pour se r\u00e9tablir dans leur confort transatlantique. Plus que le danger de la chose qu’\u00e9voque Hass, nous dirions que la perspective est un fait acquis, sur lequel on peut d’ores et d\u00e9j\u00e0 compter. Le syst\u00e8me US est totalement incapable d’endiguer les \u00e9v\u00e9nements pour la simple raison qu’il en est la cause fondamentale ; il s’en d\u00e9duit ais\u00e9ment qu’au lieu de les contenir il ne cesse de les alimenter par ses conceptions et ses actes : \u00ab I am hard-pressed to think of any other moment in modern times where there have been so many challenges facing this country simultaneously, said Richard N. Hass, a former senior Bush administration official who heads the Council on Foreign Relations. The danger is that Mr. Bush will hand over a White House to a successor that will face a far messier world, with far fewer resources left to cope with it.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tOn mettra \u00e9galement en \u00e9vidence la d\u00e9stabilisation compl\u00e8te de cet establishment<\/em> qui est incapable, d’une semaine \u00e0 l’autre, d’avoir une vision stable de la situation mondiale qu’il pr\u00e9tend dominer et contr\u00f4ler. (On peut se reporter pour en avoir la d\u00e9monstration \u00e0 l’impression que confiait tr\u00e8s r\u00e9cemment<\/a> William Pfaff, qu’on comparera avec celle que nous donne l’article du Post<\/em>.) La cause en est fort simple, qu’on dira au risque de se r\u00e9p\u00e9ter : la d\u00e9stabilisation du monde commence \u00e0 Washington m\u00eame, qui en est la source et l’aliment \u00e0 la fois.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 6 juillet 2006 \u00e0 09H34<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

La derni\u00e8re foucade du Nord-Cor\u00e9en Kim junior semble avoir plong\u00e9 l’establishment washingtonien dans la plus compl\u00e8te d\u00e9pression. C’est ce qu’on conclut d’un impressionnant article (A Driven President Faces a World of Crises) que publie le Washington Post, o\u00f9 les uns et les autres s’emploient \u00e0 dresser le bilan tr\u00e8s sombre d’une non-politique \u00e9trang\u00e8re volant au… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1007,3253,4479,5582,5427,1131,4137],"class_list":["post-67720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-albright","tag-americanisme","tag-destabilisation","tag-hass","tag-perfect","tag-pfaff","tag-storm"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67720"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67720\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}