Post<\/em>, que nous citions dans le m\u00eame Bloc-Notes, un autre passage consacr\u00e9 aux m\u00eames r\u00e9flexions de Susan C. Schwab, la nouvelle et tr\u00e8s caract\u00e9ristique U.S. Trade Representative, o\u00f9 l’hypoth\u00e8se mentionn\u00e9e ici est \u00e9voqu\u00e9e avec un souci de transparence digne d’\u00e9loge :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00ab But participants at this weekend’s meetings acknowledged that a failed round could lead to a fracturing of the multilateral trading system as big powers strike more two-way and regional trade partnerships. U.S. officials have never been shy about saying that while they prefer big worldwide deals, they will pursue smaller pacts with willing partners as an alternative. Schwab took the same stance.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb At this point, we’re fully committed to the Doha round, she said. But she added, it might be noticed here that a U.S. free-trade agreement with Oman passed the Senate a few days ago, and that the next round of talks on a similar accord with South Korea is imminent.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb The prospect that smaller deals will eventually dominate global trade, and undermine the WTO’s clout as the system’s arbiter, puts developing countries in a dilemma because they are eager to keep the leverage that WTO rules give them.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 6 juillet 2006 \u00e0 09H57<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Certaines sources dans les milieux europ\u00e9ens sont persuad\u00e9es, notamment apr\u00e8s l’\u00e9pisode de dimanche dernier des n\u00e9gociations multilat\u00e9rales (OMC) de Doha, que les Am\u00e9ricains sont d\u00e9sormais d\u00e9cid\u00e9s \u00e0 liquider ce processus. Cette volont\u00e9 serait notamment l’une des causes de leur durcissement brutal au niveau de la r\u00e9duction des tarifs douaniers. (Cette analyse ne contredisant pas celle… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5583,4795,4116,5576],"class_list":["post-67721","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bilateral","tag-doha","tag-omc","tag-schwab"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67721","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67721"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67721\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67721"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67721"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67721"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}