Devant le Parlement europ\u00e9en, la ministre fran\u00e7aise de la d\u00e9fense Mich\u00e8le Alliot-Marie a confirm\u00e9 les informations selon lesquelles elle avait parl\u00e9 avec Tony Blair, le 9 juin dernier, d’une dissuasion concert\u00e9e pouvant mener \u00e0 une sorte de force de frappe nucl\u00e9aire europ\u00e9anis\u00e9e, comprenant Fran\u00e7ais et Britanniques (\u00ab a kind of Europeanised nuclear force or eurobomb<\/em> \u00bb). Ces entretiens se placent dans le cours des interrogations britanniques courantes concernant la succession de l’actuel syst\u00e8me SLBM\/Trident<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tR\u00e9actions, rapport\u00e9es par EUObserver<\/a> hier.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00ab Her confirmation sparked criticism by Geoffrey Van Orden, defence spokesman for the UK conservatives in the European Parliament.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb He argued Given the importance of the independent nuclear deterrent to the national security of the United Kingdom, I am very surprised that the prime minister did not mention that such a vital issue is currently being discussed.\u00a0\u00bb-<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb Mr Van Orden said that while the UK and France have been on different sides of the argument on several key foreign policy issues, It would be the most extraordinary act of folly if we were to become in any way reliant on France for the ultimate strategic defence capability of our nation.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tVan Orden est un dur chez les conservateurs, relais \u00e9vident des am\u00e9ricanistes. Son propos doit \u00eatre entendu \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re de l’\u00e9vidence, largement expos\u00e9e ces derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es de la compl\u00e8te<\/strong> suj\u00e9tion de la force de frappe UK \u00e0 la d\u00e9cision am\u00e9ricaine, et dont Van Orden conna\u00eet les modalit\u00e9s en long, en large et travers. Le 6 novembre 2006, The Independent<\/a> notait : \u00ab The blueprints, engines, fuel and guidance systems are American. Lockheed-Martin, a US corporation, is one of the three companies managing Aldermaston. Washington knows where that elusive British submarine on patrol today is hiding, and where it’s going. The missiles can’t be fired without information from American satellites.<\/em> \u00bb (Voir aussi notre F&C<\/a> du 2 mai 2005.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tConclusion: puisqu’il invoque comme impossibilit\u00e9 d’une entente UK-France sur le nucl\u00e9aire les divergences de politique ext\u00e9rieure des deux pays, cela signifie a contrario<\/em> que, dans son esprit et, sans doute, selon son information, la fourniture et l’utilisation du nucl\u00e9aire US aux Britanniques sont absolument<\/strong> conditionn\u00e9es \u00e0 l’alignement britannique sur la politique ext\u00e9rieure US.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 8 juillet 2006 \u00e0 16H08<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Devant le Parlement europ\u00e9en, la ministre fran\u00e7aise de la d\u00e9fense Mich\u00e8le Alliot-Marie a confirm\u00e9 les informations selon lesquelles elle avait parl\u00e9 avec Tony Blair, le 9 juin dernier, d’une dissuasion concert\u00e9e pouvant mener \u00e0 une sorte de force de frappe nucl\u00e9aire europ\u00e9anis\u00e9e, comprenant Fran\u00e7ais et Britanniques (\u00ab a kind of Europeanised nuclear force or eurobomb… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3835,3435,3004,5589,4775,2758,4164],"class_list":["post-67729","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-alliot-marie","tag-cooperation","tag-nucleaire","tag-orden","tag-trident","tag-uk","tag-van"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67729","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67729"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67729\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67729"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67729"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67729"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}