Ceci doit \u00eatre d\u00e9sormais bien compris : pour l’USAF, le F-22 est en train de devenir un concurrent du JSF. Il l’est dans la programmation budg\u00e9taire, comme on l’a vu<\/a>, mais il le devient aussi, et c’est beaucoup plus grave, sur le front de l’exportation. Comme chacun sait, si le premier adversaire du JSF est la r\u00e9alit\u00e9<\/a>, le second, directement apr\u00e8s, est la concurrence bureaucratique interne \u00e0 Washington et, particuli\u00e8rement, au sein de l’USAF. (Avec un Lockheed Martin perplexe, puisqu’il fabrique les deux avions.) Nous y sommes d\u00e9sormais en plein.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tL’Air Force Association (AFA), toujours elle, distille dans son Daily Digest<\/em> d\u00e9pendant de sa publication Air Force Magazine<\/em> (AFM), quelques nouvelles int\u00e9ressantes \u00e0 propos du F-22. Cette fois, il s’agit de confidences du chef d’\u00e9tat-major de l’USAF faites, sombre ironie, on le reconna\u00eet, lors du bapt\u00eame (le 7 juillet) du Divin Enfant<\/a>, le F-35 d\u00e9sormais Lightning<\/em> II. Voici le texte, mis en ligne aujourd’hui<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00ab Foreign Raptors:<\/em><\/strong> Gen. Michael Moseley thinks he would be comfortable with allied nations operating the super-sophisticated F-22. (The House has included a provision for Raptor foreign sales in its version of the 2007 defense appropriations bill.) However, the Air Force Chief of Staff believes there would have to be some heavy discussion about itwho would get them, for how much, and when. We will have to go back and recalculate, Moseley said. He explained: If the collective community believes that’s do-able, do those airplanes come out of the existing [production] line or are they added? If they are additive, what does that do to the line, what does that do to a potential multiyear [buy of F-22s]? I don’t know yet. Those are the operative questions. Moseley said he would have to assemble a team to work the issue, and that the topics would probably mirror those that have come up on the F-35technology transfer and sovereign operations. Still, strategic partnering on programs like the F-16 and F-35, with their airman-to-airman habitual relationship is an inherent good for us, Moseley asserted. Such a partnership on the F-22 may be another one. He remains open to the possibility.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tOn observera combien les r\u00e9f\u00e9rences sont f\u00e2cheuses pour qui esp\u00e9rerait encore que le JSF soit la seule arme am\u00e9ricaniste \u00e0 l’exportation : constitution d’une \u00e9quipe type-JSF pour la prospection, m\u00eames r\u00e8gles de transfert de technologies (\u00e0 vos souhaits, a contrario<\/em> : puisque le JSF serait ainsi soumis aux m\u00eames r\u00e8gles de contr\u00f4le \u00e0 l’exportation que le F-22, la messe est dite pour nos amis britanniques) Tout cela vient de l’agitation de l’opposition australienne, qui estime que, pour les prix annonc\u00e9s, l’Australie ferait mieux<\/a> de choisir le F-22. Tout cela (bis<\/em>) vient des habitudes d’\u00e9valuation am\u00e9ricanistes des co\u00fbts et de la formidable inflation du co\u00fbt du JSF. Actuellement, le F-22 est donn\u00e9 \u00e0 $170 millions l’unit\u00e9 tandis que le JSF est pr\u00e9sent\u00e9, pour sa premi\u00e8re tranche, \u00e0 $150 millions<\/a> l’unit\u00e9. Si l’on croit, comme il est de coutume dans les milieux dirigeants occidentaux, aux pr\u00e9sentations virtualistes des capacit\u00e9s de ces avions, le choix du F-22 devient une option tr\u00e8s s\u00e9duisante pour les g\u00e9n\u00e9raux du clan transatlantique et assimil\u00e9s ; et puisqu’il est d\u00e9sormais sugg\u00e9r\u00e9 qu’il serait aussi difficile d’obtenir la technologie du JSF que celle du F-22<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 11 juillet 2006 \u00e0 09H17<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Ceci doit \u00eatre d\u00e9sormais bien compris : pour l’USAF, le F-22 est en train de devenir un concurrent du JSF. Il l’est dans la programmation budg\u00e9taire, comme on l’a vu, mais il le devient aussi, et c’est beaucoup plus grave, sur le front de l’exportation. Comme chacun sait, si le premier adversaire du JSF est… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3143,5597,249,3318,250,4005,5399],"class_list":["post-67737","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-air","tag-exportation","tag-f-22","tag-force","tag-jsf","tag-magazine","tag-moseley"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67737","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67737"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67737\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67737"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67737"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67737"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}