{"id":67741,"date":"2006-07-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-07-12T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/12\/au-fait-liran-vous-connaissez\/"},"modified":"2006-07-12T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-07-12T00:00:00","slug":"au-fait-liran-vous-connaissez","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/12\/au-fait-liran-vous-connaissez\/","title":{"rendered":"Au fait, l’Iran, vous connaissez ?"},"content":{"rendered":"

L’\u00e9tat totalement mis\u00e9rable de la diplomatie occidentale est bien illustr\u00e9 par l’\u00e9volution actuelle. En quelques jours, la crise iranienne d\u00e9sign\u00e9e comme fondamentale a compl\u00e8tement disparu de l’\u00e9cran-radar des robots qui nous servent de Talleyrand post-modernistes. Plus rien. On ne parle plus que de la crise nord-cor\u00e9enne.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t(Qui est d’ailleurs plut\u00f4t une crise entre la Cor\u00e9e du sud et le Japon, comme nous l’observions ing\u00e9nument le 10 juillet<\/a> ; et c’est ce que regrette pompeusement notre r\u00e9f\u00e9rence en mati\u00e8re de commentaire diplomatique, l’archi-saint et tr\u00e8s intellectuel Financial Times<\/a> : \u00ab Meanwhile, South Korea and Japan have become embroiled in a dispute over whose response to the missile tests has been more appropriate, exacerbating their differences and creating an unwelcome distraction from dealing with Pyongyang.<\/em> \u00bb Le unwelcome<\/em> ressemble aux petits coups de r\u00e8gle nerveux tap\u00e9s sur la table par le professeur agac\u00e9 rappelant \u00e0 l’ordre l’un ou l’autre \u00e9l\u00e8ve turbulent. Merci de ce rappel aux r\u00e9alit\u00e9s : la terrible menace des missiles de Kim. Dr\u00f4le d’\u00e9poque, n’est-ce pas Bouvard & P\u00e9cuchet ?)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tUne d\u00e9p\u00eache de Associated press du 9 juillet<\/a> nous informe que certains diplomates se sont avis\u00e9s du probl\u00e8me de la rel\u00e9gation de la crise iranienne en deuxi\u00e8me division :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Some diplomats involved in both<\/em> [North Korea and Iran] issues fear international focus is shifting too much to Pyongyang, which test-fired seven missiles Wednesday.<\/em> (…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Publicly, senior officials say Washington and other big powers can keep both balls in the air.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb I don’t agree that one issue distracts from the other, John Bolton, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, told The Associated Press in a phone call from New York. I think we are very focused on both of them and fully capable of dealing with both of them.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb But privately, diplomats based in Europe said over the past few days that the North Korean crisis could push talks with Iran further down the international agenda.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t(…)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb The North Korean crisis is, in some ways, similar to international concerns about Iran’s nuclear program and that worries diplomats and European officials involved in trying to entice Tehran into negotiations because both involve the same major players.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb We are trying to negotiate two sanctions resolutions with the same countries involved in both cases, said a U.N. diplomat familiar with Security Council efforts to pressure both Tehran and Pyongyang to compromise. This will be a very complicated challenge.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tQuelle est la cause de cette \u00e9trange dispersion? Les crises ne sont pas appr\u00e9ci\u00e9es en tant que telles, mais en fonction des effets sur les autres partenaires, et des effets secondaires sur les relations qu’on a avec ces partenaires, tout cela avec une manipulation m\u00e9diatique intense qui mobilise l’attention. (Sinon, y aurait-il des crises ? Question pos\u00e9e.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tDans la crise iranienne et la crise nord-cor\u00e9enne, Bush agit principalement en fonction de son opinion publique et des forces politiques de Washington. Les Europ\u00e9ens agissent principalement en fonction de leurs relations avec les USA, qui ne doivent en aucun cas \u00eatre compromises. Russes et Chinois agissent en fonction de leurs relations avec l’Ouest et avec les deux pays au centre de la crise. (De tous les acteurs, les Chinois et les Russes sont de loin les plus \u00e0 l’aise et ils ne cessent de le montrer davantage. Ce sont sans doute les seuls qui coordonnent leurs propres actions diplomatiques dans les crises iranienne et nord-cor\u00e9enne, avec leur droit de veto \u00e0 l’ONU servant successivement de carotte et de b\u00e2ton.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 12 juillet 2006 \u00e0 08H16<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L’\u00e9tat totalement mis\u00e9rable de la diplomatie occidentale est bien illustr\u00e9 par l’\u00e9volution actuelle. En quelques jours, la crise iranienne d\u00e9sign\u00e9e comme fondamentale a compl\u00e8tement disparu de l’\u00e9cran-radar des robots qui nous servent de Talleyrand post-modernistes. Plus rien. On ne parle plus que de la crise nord-cor\u00e9enne. (Qui est d’ailleurs plut\u00f4t une crise entre la Cor\u00e9e… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3299,3228,2628,2773],"class_list":["post-67741","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-coree","tag-crise","tag-diplomatie","tag-iran"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67741","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67741"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67741\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67741"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67741"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67741"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}