{"id":67744,"date":"2006-07-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-07-13T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/13\/le-perfect-storm-comme-politique-parfaite\/"},"modified":"2006-07-13T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-07-13T00:00:00","slug":"le-perfect-storm-comme-politique-parfaite","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/13\/le-perfect-storm-comme-politique-parfaite\/","title":{"rendered":"Le \u201cperfect storm<\/em>\u201d comme politique parfaite"},"content":{"rendered":"

Ce terme (perfect storm<\/em>) est en train de s’imposer partout comme marque de fabrique de la politique am\u00e9ricaniste. Il a partout sa place. Il s’applique aussi bien \u00e0 la situation ext\u00e9rieure qu’\u00e0 la situation int\u00e9rieure. Il semble avoir atteint \u00e0 une sorte d’universalit\u00e9 (de perfection ?).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tL’expression perfect storm<\/em> est un terme employ\u00e9 en m\u00e9t\u00e9orologie pour d\u00e9signer un ouragan tellement puissant et destructeur qu’il en devient arch\u00e9typique, la chose parfaite si vous voulez. Dans le cas qui nous occupe, perfect storm<\/em> d\u00e9signe la conjonction et la convergence de tous les \u00e9l\u00e9ments possibles, tensions, crises r\u00e9gionales, agressions, d\u00e9s\u00e9quilibres, etc., pour aboutir \u00e0 la crise parfaite, la Grande, la Der des Ders<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t• Apr\u00e8s la nouvelle et excellente initiative du gouvernement isra\u00e9lien d’attaque du Liban (pourquoi ne pas recommencer les m\u00eames sottises dont on conna\u00eet l’absurdit\u00e9 et les effets d\u00e9sastreux depuis un quart de si\u00e8cle ?), Rupert Cornwell, de The Independent<\/em>, observe (aujourd’hui 13 juillet<\/a>) : \u00ab Rarely can United States policy in the Middle East have been in such disarray as now.<\/em> \u00bb Cette remarque sans am\u00e9nit\u00e9 est pr\u00e9c\u00e9d\u00e9e d’un titre o\u00f9 il nous est dit ceci : \u00ab American policy in Middle East caught in a perfect storm’<\/em> \u00bb <\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t• Dans un tr\u00e8s long article cr\u00e9pusculaire sur la situation au Pentagone, le New York Times<\/em>, en date du 11 juillet<\/a>, nous donne une citation o\u00f9 l’expression revient : \u00ab It’s a perfect storm, said Lawrence J. Korb, a former Pentagon assistant secretary, who served in the Reagan administration and is now a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress. You had this big buildup in military spending. That took a bubbling problem and made it worse. It made it more difficult to audit and keep track of what was going on. It’s always been bad, but I’ve never seen it this bad.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLes mots (les expressions) ont une vie propre, une \u00e2me si l’on veut. Ils d\u00e9crivent une situation autant qu’ils contribuent \u00e0 la cr\u00e9er, s’ils ne la cr\u00e9ent pas bel et bien parfois. C’est le cas avec perfect storm<\/em>, qui nous propose un paradoxal caract\u00e8re d’immobilit\u00e9 avec perfect<\/em> (la perfection est quelque chose qui ne bouge plus) contrastant avec le mot storm<\/em> qui en est l’exact contraire. C’est comme si nous avions atteint l’il du cyclone, l\u00e0 o\u00f9 tout s’apaise C’est un peu la situation o\u00f9 vogue d\u00e9sormais, sur la mer immobile et d\u00e9cha\u00een\u00e9e, la politique am\u00e9ricaniste.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 13 juillet 2006 \u00e0 10H51<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ce terme (perfect storm) est en train de s’imposer partout comme marque de fabrique de la politique am\u00e9ricaniste. Il a partout sa place. Il s’applique aussi bien \u00e0 la situation ext\u00e9rieure qu’\u00e0 la situation int\u00e9rieure. Il semble avoir atteint \u00e0 une sorte d’universalit\u00e9 (de perfection ?). L’expression perfect storm est un terme employ\u00e9 en m\u00e9t\u00e9orologie… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3194,5427,4607,4137,2671],"class_list":["post-67744","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-pentagone","tag-perfect","tag-politique","tag-storm","tag-us"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67744","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67744"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67744\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67744"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67744"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67744"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}