ceci<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00ab Military analysts in Israel’s leading newspapers, who often reflect the army’s thinking, raised the prospect of big troop incursions into Lebanon. Just a few days ago, the same analysts predicted the operation would need only another week or two. Now they are describing it as the second Lebanon war, bringing back memories of the 1982 invasion and subsequent 18-year occupation of southern Lebanon, which is regarded as Israel’s biggest military mistake.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb For eight days, the Israeli defence forces have been pounding Lebanon and dropping thousands of tonnes of bombs on it, yet Hizbullah remains the same intransigent rival as before. It is showing no signs of breaking, Amos Harel wrote in the Haaretz newspaper yesterday. He said it would be difficult for Israel to stop the operation and still show any real political achievements. Significant civilian casualties in northern Israel, or among the military, could lessen the considerable public support within Israel for the war.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb In the Ma’ariv newspaper, Amir Rappaport warned that the fight would escalate. The second Lebanon war will be accompanied by tough battles on the ground. We hope that there will not be many more casualties, but yesterday’s hard fighting was certainly only the beginning.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 21 juillet 2006 \u00e0 09H58<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
L’op\u00e9ration Changement de Direction de Tsahal contre le Hezbollah devait durer une semaine ou deux. Le chef d’\u00e9tat-major, le lieutenant g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Dan Halutz, vient d’avertir ses forces que la bataille pourrait durer plus longtemps que pr\u00e9vu. Une invasion terrestre n’est pas \u00e9cart\u00e9e. D’une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, cet \u00e9largissement du conflit est moins per\u00e7u comme une affirmation… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5544,4472,5658,5659,4096,4714],"class_list":["post-67777","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-critiques","tag-hezbollah","tag-high","tag-tech","tag-technologies","tag-tsahal"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67777","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67777"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67777\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67777"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67777"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67777"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}