{"id":67787,"date":"2006-07-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-07-24T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/24\/la-bombe-de-tsahal-cest-la-cesarienne-de-condi\/"},"modified":"2006-07-24T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-07-24T00:00:00","slug":"la-bombe-de-tsahal-cest-la-cesarienne-de-condi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/24\/la-bombe-de-tsahal-cest-la-cesarienne-de-condi\/","title":{"rendered":"La bombe de <em>Tsahal<\/em>, c&rsquo;est la c\u00e9sarienne de Condi"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La diplomatie am\u00e9ricaniste a atteint son domaine absolu de pr\u00e9dilection et de <em>nirvana<\/em>, apr\u00e8s une longue marche commenc\u00e9e \u00e0 Hiroshima en ao\u00fbt 1945. La diplomatie am\u00e9ricaniste est d\u00e9sormais tout enti\u00e8re contenue dans une bombe, et il n&rsquo;est m\u00eame plus n\u00e9cessaire (ouf de soulagement !) qu&rsquo;elle soit nucl\u00e9aire. C&rsquo;est ainsi qu&rsquo;on devrait interpr\u00e9ter les d\u00e9clarations de Condi Rice, samedi,  d\u00e9clarations que tout esprit de bon sens pourrait qualifier, en passant et sans trop s&rsquo;\u00e9mouvoir, de surr\u00e9alistes et d&rsquo;\u00e0 vous couper le souffle, avant de vaquer \u00e0 ses occupations.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAinsi <em>Aljazeera.net<\/em> et AP rapportent-ils <a href=\"http:\/\/english.aljazeera.net\/NR\/exeres\/124EB0C2-1CEE-4EF5-A3F6-048836DD2A59.htm\" class=\"gen\">la chose<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Condoleezza Rice has described the plight of Lebanon as a part of the birth pangs of a new Middle East and said that Israel should ignore calls for a ceasefire. This is a different Middle East. It&rsquo;s a new Middle East. It&rsquo;s  hard, We&rsquo;re going through a very violent time, the US secretary of state said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>A ceasefire would be a false promise if it simply returns us to the status quo. Such a step would allow terrorists to launch attacks at the time and terms of their choosing and to threaten innocent people, Arab and Israeli, throughout the region.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>She was speaking on Saturday after meeting with members of a United Nations team that had just returned from the region.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDe nombreux auteurs nous indiquent aujourd&rsquo;hui que c&rsquo;est en 1945, avec la Bombe, que la diplomatie am\u00e9ricaniste a commenc\u00e9 \u00e0 penser en termes militaires et \u00e0 se r\u00e9aliser en termes de tonnages de bombes. L&rsquo;amiral Gene LaRoque, de l&rsquo;U.S. Navy et revenu de tout, expliquait en 1984 (<em>The Good War<\/em>, de Studs Terkel, traduit en 2006 : <em>La bonne guerre<\/em>, aux \u00e9ditions Amsterdam) : \u00ab <em>Notre arm\u00e9e dirige notre politique \u00e9trang\u00e8re. Le d\u00e9partement d&rsquo;\u00c9tat ne fait rien de plus que de superviser et rattraper les bourdes de l&rsquo;arm\u00e9e. Le d\u00e9partement d&rsquo;\u00c9tat est devenu le laquais du Pentagone. Cela ne s&rsquo;\u00e9tait jamais produit avant la Deuxi\u00e8me Guerre mondiale<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tRice a pouss\u00e9 cette logique \u00e0 son terme. La diplomatie, c&rsquo;est la bombe, cette bombe pr\u00e9cis\u00e9ment qui tombe, qui explose, qui fracasse un immeuble \u00e0 Beyrouth, qui tue \u00e9ventuellement l&rsquo;un ou l&rsquo;autre gosse (qu&rsquo;on nous pardonne cette retape que les lib\u00e9raux humanitaristes et interventionnistes jugeront sans doute vulgaire et d\u00e9loyale). L\u00e0 commence et s&rsquo;ach\u00e8ve la diplomatie. Et, miracle ! Le nouveau Moyen-Orient est accouch\u00e9. Bon d&rsquo;accord, ce fut une c\u00e9sarienne p\u00e9nible (\u00ab <em>It&rsquo;s hard<\/em> \u00bb nous dit Condi et, ma foi, on souffre pour elle). Il faut savoir souffrir pour \u00eatre belle sur la Cinqui\u00e8me Avenue.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tVoil\u00e0 : \u00e0 Beyrouth, comme \u00e0 Kaboul et comme \u00e0 Bagdad, il est n\u00e9 le divin enfant. Sans doute vaut-il mieux rire de ces pauvres gens (c&rsquo;est de Rice qu&rsquo;on parle) puisque pleurer ne changera rien \u00e0 leur m\u00e9diocrit\u00e9 ni \u00e0 l&rsquo;immeuble fracass\u00e9 de Beyrouth.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 24 juillet 2006 \u00e0 09H21<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La diplomatie am\u00e9ricaniste a atteint son domaine absolu de pr\u00e9dilection et de nirvana, apr\u00e8s une longue marche commenc\u00e9e \u00e0 Hiroshima en ao\u00fbt 1945. La diplomatie am\u00e9ricaniste est d\u00e9sormais tout enti\u00e8re contenue dans une bombe, et il n&rsquo;est m\u00eame plus n\u00e9cessaire (ouf de soulagement !) qu&rsquo;elle soit nucl\u00e9aire. C&rsquo;est ainsi qu&rsquo;on devrait interpr\u00e9ter les d\u00e9clarations de&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5237,2628,5670,5611,3194],"class_list":["post-67787","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-condi","tag-diplomatie","tag-laroque","tag-liban","tag-pentagone"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67787","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67787"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67787\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67787"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67787"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67787"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}