{"id":67796,"date":"2006-07-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-07-27T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/27\/a-washington-on-exulte\/"},"modified":"2006-07-27T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-07-27T00:00:00","slug":"a-washington-on-exulte","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/27\/a-washington-on-exulte\/","title":{"rendered":"A Washington, on exulte"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le rapport que fait Sidney Blumenthal de la situation \u00e0 Washington est vraiment tr\u00e8s \u00e9tonnant,  c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire significatif et extraordinairement r\u00e9v\u00e9lateur. La politique am\u00e9ricaniste est <strong>vraiment<\/strong> con\u00e7ue et d\u00e9velopp\u00e9e en fonction d&rsquo;une image fabriqu\u00e9e \u00e0 partir de conceptions d&rsquo;une na\u00efvet\u00e9 qui surprend malgr\u00e9 l&rsquo;habitude. Aucune attention n&rsquo;est accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 (notamment la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 des consid\u00e9rables difficult\u00e9s isra\u00e9liennes).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl semble que Washington soit \u00e0 nouveau lanc\u00e9 dans une politique conceptuelle similaire \u00e0 celle qui avait conduit l&rsquo;affaire irakienne, notamment dans l&rsquo;analyse politique qui en \u00e9tait faite. Les n\u00e9o-conservateurs sont de retour parce qu&rsquo;eux seuls peuvent apporter  une dialectique et des conceptions si compl\u00e8tement lib\u00e9r\u00e9es de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9, qu&rsquo;elles permettent effectivement \u00e0 Condi Rice d&rsquo;avancer une nouvelle th\u00e9orie des dominos&rsquo;. Les n\u00e9o-conservateurs sont bien des idiots utiles&rsquo;.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tBlumenthal r\u00e9sume ainsi la situation (dans le <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/israel\/comment\/0,,1830932,00.html\" class=\"gen\">Guardian<\/a> du 26 juillet), en se r\u00e9f\u00e9rant effectivement \u00e0 la th\u00e9orie des dominos des ann\u00e9es 1960 :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Once again the Bush administration is floating on a wave of euphoria. Israel&rsquo;s offensive against Hizbullah in Lebanon has liberated the utopian strain of neoconservatism that had been traduced by Iraq&rsquo;s sectarian civil war. And the secretary of state, Condoleezza Rice, has propelled herself forward as chief cheerleader. What we&rsquo;re seeing here, she said, are the birth pangs of a new Middle East. At every press conference she repeats the phrase a new Middle East as though its incantation is magical.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Her jaunt to the region is intended to lend the appearance of diplomacy in order to forestall it. As explained to me by several senior state department officials, Rice is entranced by a new domino theory&rsquo;: Israel&rsquo;s attacks will demolish Hizbullah; the Lebanese will blame Hizbullah and destroy its influence; and the backlash will extend to Hamas, which will collapse. From the administration&rsquo;s point of view, this is a proxy war with Iran (and Syria) that will inexplicably help turn around Iraq. We will prevail, Rice says.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 27 juillet 2006 \u00e0 07H51<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le rapport que fait Sidney Blumenthal de la situation \u00e0 Washington est vraiment tr\u00e8s \u00e9tonnant, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire significatif et extraordinairement r\u00e9v\u00e9lateur. La politique am\u00e9ricaniste est vraiment con\u00e7ue et d\u00e9velopp\u00e9e en fonction d&rsquo;une image fabriqu\u00e9e \u00e0 partir de conceptions d&rsquo;une na\u00efvet\u00e9 qui surprend malgr\u00e9 l&rsquo;habitude. Aucune attention n&rsquo;est accord\u00e9e \u00e0 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 (notamment la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 des consid\u00e9rables&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[1081,5681,3246,1104,3306],"class_list":["post-67796","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-blumenthal","tag-dominos","tag-moyen-orient","tag-neocons","tag-rice"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67796","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67796"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67796\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67796"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67796"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67796"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}