{"id":67797,"date":"2006-07-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-07-27T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/27\/visions-de-gw\/"},"modified":"2006-07-27T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-07-27T00:00:00","slug":"visions-de-gw","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/27\/visions-de-gw\/","title":{"rendered":"Visions de GW"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Confirmation de ce qui pr\u00e9c\u00e8de : la vision du monde de GW, et de la crise isra\u00e9lo-libanaise par cons\u00e9quent, n&rsquo;a pas vari\u00e9. Le ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne est consid\u00e9rable de voir le contraste entre une situation politique explosive, changeante, incontr\u00f4lable, r\u00e9volutionnaire, et la vision du pr\u00e9sident am\u00e9ricaniste, immuable, assur\u00e9e, affirm\u00e9e, intangible, verrouill\u00e9e \u00e0 double tour. Chaque \u00e9v\u00e9nement qui montre le contraire de ce qu&rsquo;il croit le met dans un \u00e9tat de transe dont on peut d\u00e9duire qu&rsquo;il juge sa vision du monde confirm\u00e9e par les \u00e9v\u00e9nements. C&rsquo;est le plus \u00e9tonnant pr\u00e9sident des Etats-Unis que nous ayons \u00e0 vous offrir<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tVoici ce qu&rsquo;en dit Maureen Dowd (et d&rsquo;autres), <a href=\"http:\/\/rozius.blogspot.com\/2006\/07\/maureen-dowd-immutable-bush.html\" class=\"gen\">hier<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Newsweek&rsquo;s Richard Wolffe says he conducted four freewheeling interviews with the president last week, and concluded: Bush thinks the new war vindicates his early vision of the region&rsquo;s struggle: of good versus evil, civilization versus terrorism, freedom versus Islamic fascism. He still believes that when it comes to war and terror, leaders need to decide whose side they are on.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The president sees Lebanon as a test of macho mettle rather than the latest chapter in a fratricidal free-for-all that&rsquo;s been going on for centuries. I view this as the forces of instability probing weakness, he said. I think they&rsquo;re testing resolve.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The more things get complicated, the more W. feels vindicated in his own simplified vision. The more people try to tell him that it&rsquo;s not easy, that this is a region of shifting alliances and interests, the less he seems inclined to develop an adroit policy to win people over to our side instead of trying to annihilate them.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Bill Clinton, the Mutable Man par excellence, evolved four times a day; he had a tactical and even recreational attitude toward personal change. But W. prides himself on his changelessness and regards his immutability as the surest sign of his virtue. Facing a map on fire, he sees any inkling of change as the slippery slope to failure.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>That&rsquo;s what is so frustrating about watching him deal  or not deal  with Iraq and Lebanon. There&rsquo;s almost nothing to watch.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>It&rsquo;s not even like watching paint dry, since that, too, is a passage from one state to another. It&rsquo;s like watching dry paint.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 27 juillet 2006 \u00e0 09H19<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Confirmation de ce qui pr\u00e9c\u00e8de : la vision du monde de GW, et de la crise isra\u00e9lo-libanaise par cons\u00e9quent, n&rsquo;a pas vari\u00e9. Le ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne est consid\u00e9rable de voir le contraste entre une situation politique explosive, changeante, incontr\u00f4lable, r\u00e9volutionnaire, et la vision du pr\u00e9sident am\u00e9ricaniste, immuable, assur\u00e9e, affirm\u00e9e, intangible, verrouill\u00e9e \u00e0 double tour. Chaque \u00e9v\u00e9nement qui&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4117,3198,5611,5682],"class_list":["post-67797","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-dowd","tag-gw","tag-liban","tag-visions"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67797","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67797"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67797\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67797"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67797"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67797"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}