{"id":67801,"date":"2006-07-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-07-28T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/28\/face-au-war-crimes-act-le-pentagone-a-bien-ouvert-son-propre-parapluie\/"},"modified":"2006-07-28T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-07-28T00:00:00","slug":"face-au-war-crimes-act-le-pentagone-a-bien-ouvert-son-propre-parapluie","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/07\/28\/face-au-war-crimes-act-le-pentagone-a-bien-ouvert-son-propre-parapluie\/","title":{"rendered":"Face au War Crimes Act, le Pentagone a bien ouvert son propre parapluie"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Des dispositions l\u00e9gales oubli\u00e9es, si elles furent jamais connues, paraissent aujourd&rsquo;hui menacer, \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re de l&rsquo;arr\u00eat de la Cour Supr\u00eame<LIEN=http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2861<D>, l&rsquo;int\u00e9grit\u00e9 future de divers officiels de l&rsquo;administration impliqu\u00e9s dans les mauvais traitements \u00e0 l&rsquo;encontre de d\u00e9tenus comme ceux de Guantamo. Il s&rsquo;agit du War Crimes Act, une l\u00e9gislation cr\u00e9\u00e9e,  paradoxalement ou ironiquement, jugera-t-on aujourd&rsquo;hui,  par un parlementaire ultra-conservateur pour punir ceux qui se montrent ill\u00e9galement brutaux avec les braves soldats am\u00e9ricanistes. (\u00ab  <em>The law&rsquo;s legislative sponsor is one of the House&rsquo;s most conservative members, Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr. (R-N.C.). He proposed it after a chance meeting with a retired Navy pilot who had spent six years in the notorious \u00a0\u00bbHanoi Hilton,\u00a0\u00bb a Vietnamese prison camp. The conversation left Jones angry about Washington&rsquo;s inability to prosecute the pilot&rsquo;s abusers.<\/em> \u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCe d\u00e9veloppement met en \u00e9vidence, dans l&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2006\/07\/27\/AR2006072701908_pf \" class=\"gen\">article<\/a> du Washington <em>Post<\/em> que nous citons, l&rsquo;int\u00e9r\u00eat du m\u00e9morandum du n\u00b02 du Pentagone, John England, sign\u00e9 le 7 juillet en fonction de la d\u00e9cision de la Cour Supr\u00eame. Comme nous l&rsquo;avions <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2889\" class=\"gen\">analys\u00e9<\/a>, l&rsquo;initiative de John England rel\u00e8ve bien d&rsquo;une politique sp\u00e9cifique du Pentagone qui a \u00e9t\u00e9 d\u00e9cid\u00e9e sans consultation des autres centres de pouvoir de l&rsquo;administration ; elle met en lumi\u00e8re la parcellisation du pouvoir \u00e0 Washington et combien chaque centre de ce pouvoir est pr\u00eat \u00e0 prendre les d\u00e9cisions les plus radicales pour prot\u00e9ger ses int\u00e9r\u00eats.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>On July 7, Deputy Secretary of Defense Gordon England signed a memorandum ordering all military departments to certify that their actions in the fight with al-Qaeda comply with Article 3. Several officials said the memo, which was reviewed by military lawyers, was provoked by the renewed threat of prosecution under the War Crimes Act.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>England&rsquo;s memo was not sent to other agencies for review. Two White House officials heavily involved in past policymaking on detainee treatment matters, counsel Harriet Miers and Addington, told friends later that they had not been briefed before its release and were unhappy about its language, according to an informed source.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 28 juillet 2006 \u00e0 12H24<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Des dispositions l\u00e9gales oubli\u00e9es, si elles furent jamais connues, paraissent aujourd&rsquo;hui menacer, \u00e0 la lumi\u00e8re de l&rsquo;arr\u00eat de la Cour Supr\u00eame<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5688,3055,5687,4526,3194,3056,4128],"class_list":["post-67801","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-act","tag-cour","tag-crimes","tag-england","tag-pentagone","tag-supreme","tag-war"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67801","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67801"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67801\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67801"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67801"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67801"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}