Nous revenons sur un passage sur Fox News, le 23 juillet, de Paul Gigot, directeur des pages Opinion du Wall Street Journal<\/em>. Le passage a \u00e9t\u00e9 remarqu\u00e9 et retenu par le site RAW Story<\/a>, le 24 juillet.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tGigot indiquait au pr\u00e9sentateur Juan Williams qu’il \u00e9tait partisan de la livraison acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9e de missiles am\u00e9ricains \u00e0 Isra\u00ebl. Voici le passage, avec un paragraphe de pr\u00e9sentation et d’interpr\u00e9tation de RAW Story<\/em> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00ab After implying that accelerated delivery of U.S. missiles to Israel is a humanitarian action, Juan Williams remarked that powerful bunker buster’ bombs were being shipped to Israel. Gigot exclaimed, Thank God, for the Bunker Busters’.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb JUAN WILLIAMS<\/strong>: …but the<\/em> [Arab] people, the people, are angry at Israel and the United States and see this as a one-sided deal. The U.S. speeding delivery of more military munitions, more F-15’s. U.S. made fighter jets, bombing away at Lebanon. How do you imagine that won’t result in animosity and generations of people who are just furious.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb PAUL GIGOT<\/strong>: So you’re furious because we’re sending target weapons, these smart weapons that can explicitly…<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb WILLIAMS<\/strong>: Oh, have you seen the pictures<\/em> [of Lebanon], Paul?<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb GIGOT<\/strong>: Look, it’s a very difficult situation. The smart weapons actually do less damage. We ought to speed more weapons over there because it will do less damage to civilians.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb WILLIAMS<\/strong>: I think the weapons they are speeding over there are those bunker busters.’<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bb GIGOT<\/strong>: Thank God for the bunker busters’ because they are able to get to people 100 feet down.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tEn avril 1999, Vaclav Havel avait applaudi les bombardements humanitaires contre la Serbie. Il avait ainsi fait progresser l’esprit de la strat\u00e9gie, en ajoutant une d\u00e9licate touche humanitaire aux couleurs violentes et meurtri\u00e8res de l’explosion d’une bombe. On comprend ce que Havel veut signifier mais on n’en est pas plus fier pour lui pour autant.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tGigot, proche des n\u00e9o-conservateurs par l’interm\u00e9diaire de son journal, ajoute une dimension high-tech<\/em> au jugement du Pr\u00e9sident-moraliste de Prague. On comprend toujours bien ce que Gigot veut dire et on n’est toujours pas fier pour lui, mais on distingue en plus un de ces vieux fonds d’optimisme am\u00e9ricaniste b\u00e9at : o\u00f9 le brave Gigot a-t-il \u00e9t\u00e9 p\u00eacher que les missiles humanitaires US tapent juste ? N’a-t-il pas entendu parler des missiles de ratage de haute pr\u00e9cision<\/a>? C’est un d\u00e9faut d’information pour un journal si prestigieux.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLe cynisme humanitaire a toujours des limites. L’argument du paradoxe sur l’efficace brutalit\u00e9 des armes doit se faire en s’informant de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 op\u00e9rationnelle de la chose. Gigot a donc raison mais il a compl\u00e8tement tort. Les pleurnicheries de Juan Williams, de Fox News (un comble en l’occurrence), auront donc le dessus et l’image de Gigot restera justement attach\u00e9e \u00e0 celle des films TV montrant les victimes libanaises innocentes dans les d\u00e9combres caus\u00e9s par les armes de ratage de haute pr\u00e9cision livr\u00e9es par les usines am\u00e9ricanistes aux Isra\u00e9liens. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 29 juillet 2006 \u00e0 02H04<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Nous revenons sur un passage sur Fox News, le 23 juillet, de Paul Gigot, directeur des pages Opinion du Wall Street Journal. Le passage a \u00e9t\u00e9 remarqu\u00e9 et retenu par le site RAW Story, le 24 juillet. Gigot indiquait au pr\u00e9sentateur Juan Williams qu’il \u00e9tait partisan de la livraison acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9e de missiles am\u00e9ricains \u00e0 Isra\u00ebl.… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3288,5689,3437,3308,5690,3823,2970,4003,3372,3132],"class_list":["post-67803","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-fox","tag-gigot","tag-havel","tag-humanitaire","tag-humanitaires","tag-journal","tag-missiles","tag-news","tag-street","tag-wall"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67803","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67803"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67803\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}