{"id":67825,"date":"2006-08-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-08-02T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/02\/murtha-et-sa-difference\/"},"modified":"2006-08-02T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-08-02T00:00:00","slug":"murtha-et-sa-difference","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/02\/murtha-et-sa-difference\/","title":{"rendered":"Murtha et sa diff\u00e9rence"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le d\u00e9put\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate John Murtha marque une fois de plus sa diff\u00e9rence, non seulement de l&rsquo;administration GW Bush mais du courant politique g\u00e9n\u00e9ral. Murtha s&rsquo;est d\u00e9j\u00e0 signal\u00e9 par ses pressions <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2179\" class=\"gen\">en faveur<\/a> d&rsquo;un retrait US de l&rsquo;Irak. Sa voix a d&rsquo;autant plus d&rsquo;importance qu&rsquo;il est un vieux parlementaire, ancien Marine, tr\u00e8s proche des militaires du Pentagone. Souvent, ses prises de position sont consid\u00e9r\u00e9es comme le relais de positions que la hi\u00e9rarchie du Pentagone ne peut exprimer publiquement.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCette fois, Murtha se prononce pour un cessez-le-feu imm\u00e9diat dans la crise isra\u00e9lo-libanaise. Il le fait dans une <LIEN=http:\/\/www.post-gazette.com\/pg\/06214\/710387-177.stm>interview qu&rsquo;il donne au Pittsburgh <em>Post-Gazette<\/em> (Murtha est d\u00e9put\u00e9 de la Pennsylvanie, dont la capitale est Pittsburgh). <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tExtraits :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Pennsylvania&rsquo;s Rep. John Murtha said yesterday that he favored an immediate cease-fire in the fighting in Lebanon. His stand places the veteran Johnstown Democrat at odds with the Israeli government, and  on yet anther major Middle Eastern policy issue  at odds with the Bush administration as well.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Mr. Murtha, speaking yesterday at a Post-Gazette editorial board meeting, was asked if he favored a cease-fire in the campaign north of Israel&rsquo;s border. I think so, he said. I think it would be very difficult to justify continuing on.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Referring to the Bush administration&rsquo;s position, he said: You know, they say, Well, we want a long-term cease-fire.&rsquo; It seems to me you start with a cease-fire, and then you try to work out the details long term. If you don&rsquo;t, and you continue to have heavy-handed military action  and I support heavy-handed military action because it saves your own troops  but it creates enemies, and that&rsquo;s the problem we have.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Mr. Murtha said the fighting risked hardening against Israel the hearts and minds&rsquo; of Lebanese civilians within the general population, beyond Israel&rsquo;s entrenched enemies in the Shiite militia.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Mr. Murtha offered the analogy of U.S. fighting to defeat insurgents in the Iraqi city of Falujah: That battle was a military success, he said, but the inevitable destruction it caused alienated hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, turning a tactical victory into a setback for the broader strategy of trying to bring peace to Iraq.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 2 ao\u00fbt 2006 \u00e0 16H24<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le d\u00e9put\u00e9 d\u00e9mocrate John Murtha marque une fois de plus sa diff\u00e9rence, non seulement de l&rsquo;administration GW Bush mais du courant politique g\u00e9n\u00e9ral. Murtha s&rsquo;est d\u00e9j\u00e0 signal\u00e9 par ses pressions en faveur d&rsquo;un retrait US de l&rsquo;Irak. Sa voix a d&rsquo;autant plus d&rsquo;importance qu&rsquo;il est un vieux parlementaire, ancien Marine, tr\u00e8s proche des militaires du&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2798,2774,5611,4376],"class_list":["post-67825","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cessez-le-feu","tag-israel","tag-liban","tag-murtha"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67825","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67825"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67825\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67825"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67825"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67825"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}