{"id":67826,"date":"2006-08-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-08-02T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/02\/les-mysteres-de-cana\/"},"modified":"2006-08-02T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-08-02T00:00:00","slug":"les-mysteres-de-cana","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/02\/les-mysteres-de-cana\/","title":{"rendered":"Les myst\u00e8res de Cana"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La fureur autour du massacre de Cana, dimanche dernier, n&#8217;emp\u00eache pas les interrogations sur les circonstances et les causes de l&rsquo;attaque. <em>Tsahal<\/em> a chang\u00e9 plusieurs fois de version, ce qui n&rsquo;a fait qu&rsquo;accro\u00eetre les suspicions et les rancoeurs.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe site <em>WSWS.org<\/em> a \u00e9dit\u00e9 <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsws.org\/articles\/2006\/aug2006\/qana-a02.shtml\" class=\"gen\">ce matin<\/a> une longue analyse qui reprend d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on bien s\u00fbr tr\u00e8s critique les divers \u00e9l\u00e9ments de pr\u00e9sentation de l&rsquo;attaque de source isra\u00e9lienne.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl nous para\u00eet que <em>WSWS.org<\/em> repousse un peu vite la version de l&rsquo;erreur de tir (erreur du renseignement concernant le b\u00e2timent). L&rsquo;analyste ne semble pas comprendre que les armes de haute pr\u00e9cision, si elles garantissent la pr\u00e9cision du tir, ne garantissent \u00e9videmment pas la justesse de l&rsquo;identification de la cible, qui d\u00e9pend du renseignement. Ainsi arrive-t-on \u00e0 ce que nous nommons des <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2921\" class=\"gen\">ratages de haute pr\u00e9cision<\/a>. Il est tr\u00e8s possible que cela ait \u00e9t\u00e9 le cas durant l&rsquo;attaque de Cana. <em>Tsahal<\/em> aurait alors pr\u00e9f\u00e9r\u00e9 changer de version pour ne pas attirer l&rsquo;attention sur les possibilit\u00e9s d&rsquo;erreurs d\u00e9vastatrices avec les armes de haute pr\u00e9cision.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tVoici ci-dessous le passage de <em>WSWS.org<\/em> donnant les pr\u00e9cisions initiales sur cette premi\u00e8re version, puis la critique de cette version fond\u00e9e sur une appr\u00e9ciation fausse du fonctionnement des armes de haute pr\u00e9cision.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab  <em>Government spokeswoman Miri Eisen was interviewed on CNN shortly after the images of woman and children being pulled from the rubble were first broadcast. This is definitely a mistake, she declared. We did not target this building&#8230; The building itself was not targeted, as I said. The building itself was next to the rocket launcher sites and we are targeting all of those rocket launcher sites. This was a mistake, Israel deeply regrets this.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The claim of an accidental strike is absurd. The Israeli air force is equipped with US-supplied precision missiles that hit targets with devastating accuracy. This has been demonstrated in recent weeks in the West Bank and Gaza, where numbers of Palestinians have received phone calls from Israeli military personnel warning them that their homes would soon be bombed as punishment for alleged militant activity. Minutes after these calls are made, the air force drops a bomb destroying the targeted houses, which are often located in densely populated areas. Moreover, in recent years, Israeli missiles have been used to assassinate scores of Palestinian militants in moving vehicles.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 2 ao\u00fbt 2006 \u00e0 19H42<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La fureur autour du massacre de Cana, dimanche dernier, n&#8217;emp\u00eache pas les interrogations sur les circonstances et les causes de l&rsquo;attaque. Tsahal a chang\u00e9 plusieurs fois de version, ce qui n&rsquo;a fait qu&rsquo;accro\u00eetre les suspicions et les rancoeurs. Le site WSWS.org a \u00e9dit\u00e9 ce matin une longue analyse qui reprend d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on bien s\u00fbr tr\u00e8s&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5715,2631,5714,2774,5611,5643,3960],"class_list":["post-67826","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cana","tag-de","tag-haute","tag-israel","tag-liban","tag-precision","tag-ratage"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67826","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67826"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67826\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67826"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67826"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67826"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}