{"id":67828,"date":"2006-08-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-08-03T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/03\/limpitoyable-vox-populi\/"},"modified":"2006-08-03T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-08-03T00:00:00","slug":"limpitoyable-vox-populi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/03\/limpitoyable-vox-populi\/","title":{"rendered":"L’impitoyable vox populi<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Le cas de Tony Blair est toujours fascinant, il l’est plus que jamais. Cet homme repr\u00e9sente parfaitement le suicide de la pens\u00e9e politique europ\u00e9enne (sauf celle de l’immuable France malgr\u00e9 les tentatives nombreuses des \u00e9lites fran\u00e7aises dans ce sens la France \u00e9tant d\u00e9cid\u00e9ment plus forte que ses propres \u00e9lites). Blair repr\u00e9sente l’abdication volontaire de l’ind\u00e9pendance d’esprit si caract\u00e9ristique des moeurs intellectuelles europ\u00e9ennes, par un m\u00e9lange de fascination pour les USA et de soi-disant habilet\u00e9 (c\u00e9der \u00e0 la force pour mieux la contr\u00f4ler), avec par-dessus tout la passion id\u00e9ologique (le n\u00e9o-conservatisme blairiste, interventionnisme humanitaire) pour cacher les basses intrigues de ce m\u00eame esprit.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tUn seul juge comprend parfaitement cela : l’opinion publique britannique. Elle est impitoyable. Elle ne prive pas Tony Blair de son pouvoir, elle fait pire : elle l’humilie en le m\u00e9prisant ing\u00e9nument. Il faudra quelques discours pompeux et pr\u00e9tentieux, et un bon salaire de Murdoch, pour que Blair oublie cela.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLes r\u00e9sultats des sondages sur la politique isra\u00e9lienne de Blair sont r\u00e9sum\u00e9s dans ce passage d’un article du Guardian<\/a>. On appr\u00e9ciera le dernier r\u00e9sultat mentionn\u00e9 : 15% des Anglais pensent que Blair se fait son opinion tout seul, 64% qu’il ne fait qu’adopter celle des Am\u00e9ricains.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab Voters believe that Israeli actions are disproportionate and that in general Britain is tied too closely to the United States, according to recent polls.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb A Guardian\/ICM poll last week showed that 61% thought Israel had overreacted to the threats it faces, with only 22% of voters believing it had responded proportionately to the kidnapping of soldiers and other attacks from militant groups.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb In general foreign policy terms, 63% thought Mr Blair had tied Britain too closely to the US, with only 30% arguing that he had the balance about right. Even a majority of Labour supporters felt he had misjudged the relationship; 54% said Britain was too close to the US.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Those findings were echoed in a Daily Telegraph\/YouGov poll, which showed that a majority of voters 53% felt the government had performed poorly or very poorly during the crisis. Most echoed Kim Howell’s criticism, with respondents agreeing that Israel’s assault on south Lebanon was inappropriate and disproportionate by a margin of more than three to one.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Only 15% believed the prime minister was making up his own mind on the issue. A far greater proportion 64% felt he [gave] the impression of siding with the Americans, whatever the Americans say.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 3 ao\u00fbt 2006 \u00e0 08H24<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Le cas de Tony Blair est toujours fascinant, il l’est plus que jamais. Cet homme repr\u00e9sente parfaitement le suicide de la pens\u00e9e politique europ\u00e9enne (sauf celle de l’immuable France malgr\u00e9 les tentatives nombreuses des \u00e9lites fran\u00e7aises dans ce sens la France \u00e9tant d\u00e9cid\u00e9ment plus forte que ses propres \u00e9lites). Blair repr\u00e9sente l’abdication volontaire de l’ind\u00e9pendance… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[705,3455,3456,5190],"class_list":["post-67828","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-blair","tag-opinion","tag-publique","tag-sondage"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67828","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67828"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67828\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}