Reuters<\/a> du 2 ao\u00fbt, on entre dans un nouveau domaine de l’ins\u00e9curit\u00e9 virtualiste (qu’est-ce qui est r\u00e9el ? Qu’est-ce qui n’est pas r\u00e9el ? Quel int\u00e9r\u00eat, la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 ?). L’analyse nous annonce la signature secr\u00e8te, \u00e0 Farnborough, le 18 juillet, de l’accord tant attendu, dont on nous dit, quelques lignes plus loin, qu’il ne signifie rien et que tout reste \u00e0 faire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLe plus \u00e9tonnant dans cette aventure est donc que l’annonce de l’accord (avez-vous remarqu\u00e9 l’abondance des guillemets?) est faite pour ne gu\u00e8re provoquer d’effet, alors que le virtualisme joue \u00e0 fond sur l’effet, dont on attend qu’il convainque par son volume de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 du virtualisme. Cet effet (cette absence d’effet) est d’autant plus surprenant qu’on nous annonce aussit\u00f4t que cet accord secret sans effet n’en est pas un Ouf.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tNotre hypoth\u00e8se est donc que le virtualisme n’existe plus seulement pour agr\u00e9menter les rapports des autorit\u00e9s techniques vers le reste (vous, moi, la presse, les ministres des pays concern\u00e9s, bref la pi\u00e9taille) mais existe \u00e9galement<\/strong> entre les autorit\u00e9s techniques qui d\u00e9battent d’un probl\u00e8me. Il y a virtualisme aussi<\/strong> entre n\u00e9gociateurs britanniques et US.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tQuelques extraits de Reuters : <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00ab U.S. and British officials have signed a pact on the thorny matter of technology-sharing for the $276 billion Lockheed Martin Corp. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, the costliest weapons program yet, Pentagon officials said Wednesday.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb An agreement was signed during the Farnborough Air Show outside London last month by Kenneth Krieg, the Pentagon’s chief weapons buyer, and the British Ministry of Defense’s procurement chief, Peter Spencer, said the officials.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb Details of the pact were not disclosed.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb Inside Defense.com, an online news service which was the first to report the signing, said sticking points in deliberations likely have been British access to radar-evading technology, software code underpinning the aircraft’s operations and development of related capabilities that British firms could build and market worldwide.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb I understand that they signed it on July 18th, said Cheryl Irwin, a Pentagon spokeswoman. Kathy Crawford, a spokeswoman for the Pentagon’s F-35 program office, referred to the agreement as a statement of principles.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00bb Irwin, the Pentagon spokeswoman, said the partners were on track for the projected signing.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb But Rhian Chilcott, head of the Washington office of CBI, an industry group of British-based companies, said much hard work remains to be done before we can say that a practicable and fair tech transfer deal has been struck.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb This is a road map of how to resolve the issues, she said, rather than agreement on the issues themselves.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 4 ao\u00fbt 2006 \u00e0 09H33<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Un aspect extr\u00eamement int\u00e9ressant du dossier JSF est certainement sa dimension m\u00e9diatique et de relations publiques ; et, pour mieux embrasser le ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne , disons : sa dimension virtualiste. De la cr\u00e9ation d’\u00e9v\u00e9nements au non-\u00e9v\u00e9nement, rien ne manque dans cette cha\u00eene ininterrompue d’annonces r\u00e9p\u00e9t\u00e9es de la m\u00eame chose sensationnelle et de nouvelles dites et redites… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3507,250,610],"class_list":["post-67833","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-farnborough","tag-jsf","tag-virtualisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67833","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67833"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67833\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67833"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67833"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67833"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}