RAW Story<\/a>) met en lumi\u00e8re la signification de cette victoire :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00ab Sen. Joe Lieberman’s primary defeat Tuesday night came at the hands of Democratic voters angry over the war in Iraq and demanding that lawmakers stand up to President Bush rather than stand with him.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb It wasn’t a polite message they sent their three-term senator, a former vice presidential running mate who fell to anti-war challenger Ned Lamont. It was an eviction notice, served by an electorate that has grown remarkably sour about the course their country is on.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb That makes the result both an opportunity and a challenge for Democrats nationally as they head into a fall campaign with control of the House and Senate at stake. To triumph in November, Democrats will need the same intensity, including the support of bloggers and groups such as MoveOn.org, that powered Lamont to victory in Connecticut.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb I think there is huge dissatisfaction with the way the president is handling the war, said Sen. Chuck Schumer of New York, the chairman of the party’s Senate campaign committee. People are divided over whether we should have a strong, aggressive foreign policy, but there’s very little division even among those for a strong foreign policy that the president has really botched this in terms of having a plan, in terms of a direction, in terms of an endgame.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tIl est caract\u00e9ristique que cette pouss\u00e9e anti-guerre qui s’exprime chez les \u00e9lecteurs d\u00e9mocrates d’une fa\u00e7on extr\u00eamement convaincante et qui est aussi tr\u00e8s vive chez les r\u00e9publicains, se manifeste au moment o\u00f9 une nouvelle crise fait rage au Liban, avec la position pro-guerre de Bush et d’Isra\u00ebl largement soutenue par l’\u00e9lectorat US. On ne cesse de r\u00e9p\u00e9ter la logique officielle, que tout cela (Irak et Liban\/Hezbollah) fait partie de la m\u00eame guerre contre la terreur. Cela conduit \u00e0 observer cette contradiction par rapport \u00e0 cette rh\u00e9torique g\u00e9n\u00e9ralement admise (guerre contre la terreur): \u00eatre simultan\u00e9ment anti-guerre lorsqu’il s’agit de l’Irak et pro-guerre lorsqu’il s’agit du Hezbollah et d’Isra\u00ebl. Ce ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne va fortement alimenter les complications internes (aux USA) et il aura des r\u00e9percussions sur la politique ext\u00e9rieure. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 9 ao\u00fbt 2006 \u00e0 07H35<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Le s\u00e9nateur d\u00e9mocrate Joe Lieberman, c\u00e9l\u00e8bre pour son activisme pro-guerre et ses prises de position favorables \u00e0 la politique agressive de l’administration, a \u00e9t\u00e9 battu dans les primaires du Connecticut, pour la d\u00e9signation \u00e0 la candidature au S\u00e9nat de son parti. C’est l’anti-guerre Ned Lamont qui l’emporte. Le commentaire de ABC.News\/AP (via RAW Story) met… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5749,5748,3009,857,2774,4883],"class_list":["post-67855","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-anti-guerrre","tag-contradiction","tag-democrates","tag-irak","tag-israel","tag-lieberman"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67855","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67855"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67855\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67855"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67855"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67855"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}