{"id":67864,"date":"2006-08-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-08-11T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/11\/pendant-ce-temps-la-guerre-des-generaux\/"},"modified":"2006-08-11T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-08-11T00:00:00","slug":"pendant-ce-temps-la-guerre-des-generaux","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/11\/pendant-ce-temps-la-guerre-des-generaux\/","title":{"rendered":"Pendant ce temps, la guerre des g\u00e9n\u00e9raux&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>On peut admettre que, d\u00e9sormais, <em>the fog of the war<\/em> commence \u00e0 se dissiper sur l&rsquo;\u00e9tat r\u00e9el du conflit entre Isra\u00ebl et le Hezbollah. L&rsquo;indication la plus nette des difficult\u00e9s de <em>Tsahal<\/em> nous est sans aucun doute donn\u00e9e par ce que Uri Avnery d\u00e9signe comme la guerre des g\u00e9n\u00e9raux, dans un excellent article qu&rsquo;il publie le 10 ao\u00fbt sur le site <a href=\"http:\/\/www.informationclearinghouse.info\/article14492.htm\" class=\"gen\">Information Clearing House<\/a>. (Avnery, journaliste et \u00e9crivain isra\u00e9lien, membre actif du mouvement pour la paix <em>Gush Shalom<\/em>.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLa guerre des g\u00e9n\u00e9raux est marqu\u00e9e surtout par la querelle entre le chef d&rsquo;\u00e9tat-major et son commandant de th\u00e9\u00e2tre au Liban Sud (voir aussi <em>Haaretz<\/em> du <a href=\"http:\/\/haaretz.com\/hasen\/spages\/747973.html\" class=\"gen\">9 ao\u00fbt<\/a>), mais aussi par les querelles avec les civils.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Now everybody already admits that something basic has gone wrong in this war. The proof: the War of the Generals, that previously started only after the conclusion of a war, has now become public while the war is still going on.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The Chief-of-Staff, Dan Halutz, has found the culprit: Udi Adam, the chief of the Northern Command. He has practically dismissed him in the middle of the battle. That is the old ploy of the thief shouting Stop thief! After all, it is obvious that the person mainly to blame for the failures of the war is Halutz himself, with his foolish belief that Hizbullah could be defeated by aerial bombardment alone.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>But it is not only at the top of the army that mutual accusations are flying around. The army command accuses the government, which is retaliating in kind.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>On the eve of his downgrading, Udi Adam publicly accused the government of tying his hands. Meaning: the government is guilty. Ehud Olmert did not remain silent and declared that the army had not submitted any plans for widening the campaign. That&rsquo;s to say: if you are incompetent, don&rsquo;t blame me!<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>To justify himself, Olmert added a significant sentence: From the first day of the war, the government has not refused the army a single request! In other words, it is the Chief-of-Staff who makes policy and conducts the war, while the political leadership just rubber stamps everything that the army requests.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>But this is a sterile debate, because it ignores the main fact, which is becoming clearer from day to day: it is altogether impossible to win this war. That&rsquo;s why nothing is working as planned.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 11 ao\u00fbt 2006 \u00e0 10H37<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On peut admettre que, d\u00e9sormais, the fog of the war commence \u00e0 se dissiper sur l&rsquo;\u00e9tat r\u00e9el du conflit entre Isra\u00ebl et le Hezbollah. L&rsquo;indication la plus nette des difficult\u00e9s de Tsahal nous est sans aucun doute donn\u00e9e par ce que Uri Avnery d\u00e9signe comme la guerre des g\u00e9n\u00e9raux, dans un excellent article qu&rsquo;il publie&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5763,5762,5160,5719,4714],"class_list":["post-67864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-adam","tag-avnery","tag-generaux","tag-halutz","tag-tsahal"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67864"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67864\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}