{"id":67879,"date":"2006-08-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-08-15T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/15\/iran-next-stop\/"},"modified":"2006-08-15T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-08-15T00:00:00","slug":"iran-next-stop","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/15\/iran-next-stop\/","title":{"rendered":"Iran, Next Stop<\/em>"},"content":{"rendered":"

Isra\u00ebl a perdu, Washington et GW Bush ont perdu. Mais on dira : une fois de plus, dans ce long d\u00e9fil\u00e9 d’erreurs calamiteuses. C’est l’argument imparable qui nous fait penser que cela va continuer<\/a>. C’est aussi l’avis de Patrick J. Buchanan (aujourd’hui<\/a>, sur Antiwar.com<\/em>), qui d\u00e9signe avec horreur la prochaine \u00e9tape. Puisque rien n’a march\u00e9 dans la pr\u00e9paration de la guerre contre l’Iran qu’\u00e9tait cette attaque du Hezbollah par Isra\u00ebl, c’est donc qu’il faut lancer la guerre contre l’Iran. Leur logique, comme leur position politique est effectivement dans cette impasse de l’absurde.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tBuchanan d\u00e9veloppe cet argument d’un d\u00e9veloppement compl\u00e8tement catastrophique avec le d\u00e9senchantement, le d\u00e9go\u00fbt et la fatalisme qui conviennent. (Et le d\u00e9veloppement catastrophique pour on sait qui : \u00ab If the president is still listening to these people, Lord help the Republic.<\/em> \u00bb)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00ab What comes next? That is obvious.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb With our War Party discredited by the failed policies it cheered on in Lebanon and Iraq, there will come a clamor that Bush must go to the source of all our difficulty Iran. Only thus can the War Party redeem itself for having pushed us and Israel into two unnecessary and ruinous wars. And the drumbeat for war on Iran has already begun.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb [T]he dangers continue to mount abroad, wails The Weekly Standard in its lead editorial. How Bush deals with Ahmadinejad’s terror-supporting and nuclear-weapons pursuing Iran will be the test of his administration. Yes, the supreme test.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb Bush is on notice from the neocons and War Party that have all but destroyed his presidency: Either you take down Iran, Mr. Bush, or you are a failed president.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bb If the president is still listening to these people, Lord help the Republic.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 15 ao\u00fbt \u00e0 08H43<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Isra\u00ebl a perdu, Washington et GW Bush ont perdu. Mais on dira : une fois de plus, dans ce long d\u00e9fil\u00e9 d’erreurs calamiteuses. C’est l’argument imparable qui nous fait penser que cela va continuer. C’est aussi l’avis de Patrick J. Buchanan (aujourd’hui, sur Antiwar.com), qui d\u00e9signe avec horreur la prochaine \u00e9tape. Puisque rien n’a march\u00e9… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3335,3198,4472,2773,1104,5632],"class_list":["post-67879","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-buchanan","tag-gw","tag-hezbollah","tag-iran","tag-neocons","tag-olmert"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67879","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67879"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67879\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67879"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67879"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67879"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}