{"id":67890,"date":"2006-08-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-08-17T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/17\/une-indifference-significative-dune-fatigue-psychologique\/"},"modified":"2006-08-17T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-08-17T00:00:00","slug":"une-indifference-significative-dune-fatigue-psychologique","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/17\/une-indifference-significative-dune-fatigue-psychologique\/","title":{"rendered":"Une indiff\u00e9rence significative d&rsquo;une fatigue psychologique"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Encore un sondage, encore venu de l&rsquo;Institut John Zogby. Il porte sur l&rsquo;attitude du public am\u00e9ricain vis-\u00e0-vis du pr\u00e9sident et de sa politique et nous offre des <a href=\"http:\/\/www.zogby.com\/news\/ReadNews.dbm?ID=1157\" class=\"gen\">r\u00e9sultats<\/a> int\u00e9ressants.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>The survey was conducted Aug. 1115, 2006, included 1,018 respondents, and carries a margin of error of +\/ 3.1 percentage points.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>The numbers continue to reflect erosion in the President&rsquo;s political base  just 62% of Republicans give him positive marks for his job performance, while 38% give him negative marks. Even among weekly WalMart shoppers  a demographic group identified by Pollster John Zogby as a critical support group for Bush  just 45% now give him positive job marks, though his numbers among those shoppers have improved 10 points since early June.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>More than three out of four  76%  of weekly WalMart shoppers voted for Bush over Democrat John Kerry in the 2004 presidential election, earlier Zogby polling showed.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>Among both conservatives and those who consider themselves very conservative, 59% give him positive marks, while 41% in each group gave him a negative job rating.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>One third of respondents  34%  said that, overall, the nation is headed in the right direction, while 59% said they think things are off on the wrong track.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe commentaire direct de John Zogby \u00ab <em>President Bush&rsquo;s numbers mainly reflect the country&rsquo;s thinking on the war in Iraq, and most people have made up their minds that the war overall has not been worth the loss of American lives. Terrorism is an important issue to Americans, but when it comes to judging Bush&rsquo;s presidency, their decision is based largely on Iraq.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDe fa\u00e7on plus large, nous observons que l&rsquo;attitude du public est en fait de plus en plus indiff\u00e9rente aux sollicitations des services de communication (de virtualisme) de l&rsquo;administration et de son fid\u00e8le lieutenant, la presse MSM. Le sondage a \u00e9t\u00e9 effectu\u00e9 entre les 11 et 15 ao\u00fbt, en pleine exploitation du soi-disant complot 8\/10. Le r\u00e9sultat est nul, quasiment comme si rien n&rsquo;avait exist\u00e9 (ce qui n&rsquo;est peut-\u00eatre pas si mal vu quant \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9v\u00e9nement). Le contraste est saisissant entre l&rsquo;agitation des New York <em>Times<\/em>, Washington <em>Post<\/em> et autres Wall Street <em>Journal<\/em> \u00e0 propos de 8\/10 et les jugements du public. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tM\u00eame si la th\u00e8se de Zogby est juste ou en partie juste (importance de la crise irakienne), il reste que l&rsquo;absence totale d&rsquo;effet de 8\/10, quasiment dans l&rsquo;heure o\u00f9 tout est activ\u00e9 pour dramatiser cet effet, est un ph\u00e9nom\u00e8ne int\u00e9ressant. Le public n&rsquo;a pas une psychologie compartiment\u00e9e entre les diverses crises, d\u00e8s lors que toutes ces choses sont r\u00e9f\u00e9renc\u00e9es dans la rubrique guerre contre la terreur. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tNotre hypoth\u00e8se est alors qu&rsquo;on serait en train de passer d&rsquo;une r\u00e9action \u00e0 telle ou telle crise (et aux sollicitations et manipulations du pouvoir), comme ce fut le cas jusqu&rsquo;ici, \u00e0 une fatigue g\u00e9n\u00e9ralis\u00e9e face au comportement de l&rsquo;administration GW et des \u00e9lites US totalement intoxiqu\u00e9es par leur virtualisme. Cela ne signifie pas une compr\u00e9hension des probl\u00e8mes mais bien ce que nous disons : une fatigue devant ce qui est per\u00e7u comme brouillon, insens\u00e9, sans but et tr\u00e8s co\u00fbteux,  une fatigue g\u00e9n\u00e9ralis\u00e9e et presque instinctive devant le d\u00e9sordre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tSi l&rsquo;hypoth\u00e8se est fond\u00e9e, les r\u00e9sultats de novembre pourraient effectivement amener un bouleversement (Congr\u00e8s passant dans les mains des d\u00e9mocrates devenus anti-guerre). Pour autant, ce bouleversement ne r\u00e9soudrait rien. Il refl\u00e9terait cette position du public fatigu\u00e9 du d\u00e9sordre et freinant d\u00e9cisivement l&rsquo;action de Washington. Il serait g\u00e9n\u00e9rateur d&rsquo;une compl\u00e8te paralysie (entre l&rsquo;ex\u00e9cutif pro-guerre et un Congr\u00e8s devenu anti-guerre).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 17 ao\u00fbt 2006 \u00e0 09H26<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Encore un sondage, encore venu de l&rsquo;Institut John Zogby. Il porte sur l&rsquo;attitude du public am\u00e9ricain vis-\u00e0-vis du pr\u00e9sident et de sa politique et nous offre des r\u00e9sultats int\u00e9ressants. \u00ab The survey was conducted Aug. 1115, 2006, included 1,018 respondents, and carries a margin of error of +\/ 3.1 percentage points. \u00bb The numbers continue&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[236,2361,868,4141,5452,3616,3099,5190,1267,5612],"class_list":["post-67890","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-236","tag-2361","tag-bush","tag-elections","tag-fatigue","tag-manipulation","tag-psychologie","tag-sondage","tag-terrorisme","tag-zogby"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67890","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67890"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67890\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67890"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67890"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67890"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}