{"id":67916,"date":"2006-08-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-08-24T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/24\/cette-fois-on-sy-prend-a-lavance-comme-avec-lirak-le-renseignement-us-sur-liran-est-particulierement-nul\/"},"modified":"2006-08-24T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-08-24T00:00:00","slug":"cette-fois-on-sy-prend-a-lavance-comme-avec-lirak-le-renseignement-us-sur-liran-est-particulierement-nul","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/24\/cette-fois-on-sy-prend-a-lavance-comme-avec-lirak-le-renseignement-us-sur-liran-est-particulierement-nul\/","title":{"rendered":"Cette fois, on s&rsquo;y prend \u00e0 l&rsquo;avance : comme avec l&rsquo;Irak, le renseignement US sur l&rsquo;Iran est particuli\u00e8rement nul"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La catastrophe irakienne avait \u00e9t\u00e9 commenc\u00e9e \u00e0 partir d&rsquo;un renseignement am\u00e9ricain compl\u00e8tement manipul\u00e9, d\u00e9sinform\u00e9 et catastrophiquement faux. Il semble que l&rsquo;Iran, avec qui on envisage \u00e9galement un affrontement, ne soit pas mieux loti. Un article du <em>Guardian<\/em> d&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/iran\/story\/0,,1857034,00.html\" class=\"gen\">aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a> signale la diffusion hier d&rsquo;un rapport de la Chambre des Repr\u00e9senants :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>A new report by the staff of the House of Representatives intelligence committee suggested that the administration was ill-equipped to drive a hard bargain. It found significant gaps in our knowledge and understanding of the various areas of concern about Iran and said policymakers will need high-quality intelligence to assess Iranian intentions to prepare for any new round of negotiations.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl y a pourtant dans cette \u00e9valuation US de l&rsquo;Iran, malgr\u00e9 la similitude de (mauvaise) qualit\u00e9, une tr\u00e8s grande diff\u00e9rence avec la situation irakienne (\u00e9valuation US de l&rsquo;Irak avant l&rsquo;invasion de l&rsquo;Irak). Le climat \u00e0 Washington est compl\u00e8tement diff\u00e9rent. Le d\u00e9sordre et la confusion ont remplac\u00e9 la confiance en soi arrogante de l&rsquo;ann\u00e9e 2002. L&rsquo;atmosph\u00e8re est tellement d\u00e9l\u00e9t\u00e8re \u00e0 Washington qu&rsquo;il ne semble plus gu\u00e8re question de manipulations et de dissimulation de la part de l&rsquo;administration GW pour ce qui concerne l&rsquo;Iran, comme cela avait \u00e9t\u00e9 le cas avec l&rsquo;Irak. Au contraire, le sentiment g\u00e9n\u00e9ral qui s&rsquo;installe est que les USA ne savent rien de la situation iranienne, \u00e0 un point o\u00f9 il semble impossible d&rsquo;esp\u00e9rer une am\u00e9lioration.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 24 ao\u00fbt 2006 \u00e0 10H17<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La catastrophe irakienne avait \u00e9t\u00e9 commenc\u00e9e \u00e0 partir d&rsquo;un renseignement am\u00e9ricain compl\u00e8tement manipul\u00e9, d\u00e9sinform\u00e9 et catastrophiquement faux. Il semble que l&rsquo;Iran, avec qui on envisage \u00e9galement un affrontement, ne soit pas mieux loti. Un article du Guardian d&rsquo;aujourd&rsquo;hui signale la diffusion hier d&rsquo;un rapport de la Chambre des Repr\u00e9senants : \u00ab A new report by&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[857,2773,2807,3248],"class_list":["post-67916","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-irak","tag-iran","tag-renseignement","tag-washington"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67916","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67916"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67916\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67916"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67916"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67916"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}