{"id":67919,"date":"2006-08-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-08-25T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/25\/liran-implique-dans-laction-du-hezbollah-dans-la-crise-libanaise-de-juillet-aout-pas-sur-du-tout-dit-le-renseignement-us\/"},"modified":"2006-08-25T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-08-25T00:00:00","slug":"liran-implique-dans-laction-du-hezbollah-dans-la-crise-libanaise-de-juillet-aout-pas-sur-du-tout-dit-le-renseignement-us","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/25\/liran-implique-dans-laction-du-hezbollah-dans-la-crise-libanaise-de-juillet-aout-pas-sur-du-tout-dit-le-renseignement-us\/","title":{"rendered":"L&rsquo;Iran impliqu\u00e9 dans l&rsquo;action du Hezbollah dans la crise libanaise de juillet-ao\u00fbt? Pas s\u00fbr du tout, dit le renseignement US"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La question de l&rsquo;implication plus ou moins directe de l&rsquo;Iran dans la crise entre Isra\u00ebl et le Hezbollah est d&rsquo;autant plus cruciale qu&rsquo;elle interf\u00e8re dans la crise du nucl\u00e9aire iranien en cours de maturation \u00e0 l&rsquo;ONU, en permettant d&rsquo;appr\u00e9cier le comportement de ce pays. Sur ce point \u00e9galement, la confusion est la r\u00e8gle \u00e0 Washington.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tAlors que le pouvoir politique affirme, par irr\u00e9ppressible penchant de sa psychologie belliciste et par l&rsquo;oreille aimable qu&rsquo;il pr\u00eate aux \u00e9valuations isra\u00e9liennes, que l&rsquo;Iran est effectivement impliqu\u00e9 d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on directe, le renseignement US est plus que r\u00e9ticent devant de telles conclusions. (Il s&rsquo;agit aussi bien de la CIA que du renseignement militaire, type DIA, si bien qu&rsquo;on peut parler de toute la communaut\u00e9 du renseignement US qui partage cette \u00e9valuation.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t Un article du New York <em>Times<\/em> du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2006\/08\/24\/washington\/24intel.html?_r=1&#038;ei=5094&#038;en=43069029595a3e0&#038;hp=&#038;ex=1156478400&#038;partner=homepage&#038;pagewanted=all&#038;oref=slogin\" class=\"gen\">24 ao\u00fbt<\/a> sur le sujet de la crise (une de plus) des rapports entre le pouvoir et les services de renseignement \u00e0 Washington, note ceci :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab <em>Several intelligence officials said that American spy agencies had made assessments in recent weeks that despite established ties between Iran and Hezbollah and a well-documented history of Iran arming the organization, there was no credible evidence to suggest either that Iran ordered the Hezbollah raid that touched off the recent fighting or that Iran was directly controlling attacks against Israel.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em>There are no provable signs of Iranian direction on the ground, said one intelligence official in Washington. Nobody should think that Hezbollah is a remote-controlled entity. American military assessments have broadly echoed this view, say people who maintain close ties to military intelligence officers.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb <em> Does Iran profit from all of this? Yes, said Gen. Wayne A. Downing Jr., the retired former commander of the Special Operations Command and a White House counterterrorism adviser during President Bush&rsquo;s first term. But is Iran pulling the strings? The guys I&rsquo;m talking to say, no.&rsquo;<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 25 ao\u00fbt 2006 \u00e0 07H34<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La question de l&rsquo;implication plus ou moins directe de l&rsquo;Iran dans la crise entre Isra\u00ebl et le Hezbollah est d&rsquo;autant plus cruciale qu&rsquo;elle interf\u00e8re dans la crise du nucl\u00e9aire iranien en cours de maturation \u00e0 l&rsquo;ONU, en permettant d&rsquo;appr\u00e9cier le comportement de ce pays. Sur ce point \u00e9galement, la confusion est la r\u00e8gle \u00e0 Washington.&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3104,3032,4220,2773,2807],"class_list":["post-67919","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-cia","tag-dia","tag-evaluation","tag-iran","tag-renseignement"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67919","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67919"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67919\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67919"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67919"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67919"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}