ce jour<\/a>, donne certaines indications int\u00e9ressantes.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tOn retiendra particuli\u00e8rement ce que McGovern nous dit de l’urgence o\u00f9 ce rapport a \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00e9crit, voire m\u00eame inspir\u00e9. Cela signifie que l’administration est press\u00e9e d’avoir dans la main des arguments authentifi\u00e9s (si possible par la CIA) pour se tourner vers une orientation agressive par rapport \u00e0 l’Iran, \u00e9ventuellement jusqu’\u00e0 une attaque. Bref, \u00e0 la Maison-Blanche, on est press\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00ab Hoekstra’s release of this paper is another sign pointing in the direction of a US attack on Iran. Tehran is now being blamed not only for inciting Hezbollah but also for sending improvised explosive devices (IEDs) into Iraq to kill or maim US forces.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb There is yet another, if more subtle, disquieting note about the paper. It bears the earmarks of a rushed job, with very little editorial scrubbing. There are misplaced modifiers, and verbs often do not take enough care to agree in number with their nouns.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb One wag suggested that the president may have taken a direct hand in the drafting. My guess is even more troubling. It seems to me possible that the Cheney-Rumsfeld cabal told Hoekstra to get the paper out sooner rather than later, as an aid to Americans in recognizing Iran as a strategic threat. In the coming weeks, look for mushroom clouds. They can come out of nowhereas they did in September\/October of 2002.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 26 ao\u00fbt 2006 \u00e0 09H49<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Les commentaires sont tr\u00e8s nombreux apr\u00e8s la publication mercredi du rapport du d\u00e9put\u00e9 r\u00e9publicain Pete Hoekstra attaquant la CIA pour son \u00e9valuation de la situation de la menace iranienne, et donnant de celle-ci une version tr\u00e8s pessimiste (pour les USA). Ils situent l’importance attach\u00e9e \u00e0 ce document. Un commentaire de l’ancien analyste de la CIA… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2870,3104,5820,2773,1132],"class_list":["post-67925","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-attaque","tag-cia","tag-hoekstra","tag-iran","tag-mcgovern"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67925","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67925"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67925\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67925"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67925"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67925"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}