{"id":67942,"date":"2006-08-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-08-30T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/30\/qui-controle-encore-divine-strake\/"},"modified":"2006-08-30T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-08-30T00:00:00","slug":"qui-controle-encore-divine-strake","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/08\/30\/qui-controle-encore-divine-strake\/","title":{"rendered":"Qui contr\u00f4le encore Divine Strake<\/em> ?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Qui contr\u00f4le encore Divine Strake<\/em> ?<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

Divine Strake<\/em>, le grand programme d’une gigantesque explosion conventionnelle souterraine, poursuit son chemin<\/a>. Apr\u00e8s le Nevada, c’est l’Indiana qui est en alerte. Les projets de la monstrueuse explosion de 700 tonnes d’explosif ont \u00e9t\u00e9 retard\u00e9s d’un an (de 2006 \u00e0 2007) et ont migr\u00e9 du Nevada vers (peut-\u00eatre) l’Indiana. Il semble que le test doive d\u00e9sormais \u00eatre approuv\u00e9 par une l\u00e9gislation qui serait peut-\u00eatre pr\u00e9sent\u00e9e au S\u00e9nat mardi prochain.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Cette affaire est de plus en plus myst\u00e9rieuse et apparaît comme exemplaire des imbroglios bureaucratiques dans lesquels se perd le bon sens et d’où peuvent sortir des projets d\u00e9ments. Il semble de plus en plus qu’aucune autorit\u00e9 s\u00e9rieuse ne contr\u00f4le le processus de cette exp\u00e9rimentation. Alors que, d’une part, l’annonce que le test aurait lieu dans l’Indiana avait \u00e9t\u00e9 faite \u00e0 la suggestion<\/a> du DoD, la Defense Threat Reduction Agency, qui est en charge du programme, annoncerait toujours que le nouveau site (apr\u00e8s l’abandon du Nevada) n’a pas encore \u00e9t\u00e9 choisi.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

L’Etat de l’Indiana semble persuad\u00e9 que ce sera lui. Ses \u00e9lus commencent \u00e0 prendre des positions publiques et l’affaire pourrait jouer un r\u00f4le \u00e0 l’\u00e9chelon de l’Etat dans la bataille \u00e9lectorale de novembre. Une d\u00e9p\u00eache de l’Associated Press reprise par le journal Indianapolis Star<\/em> observait qu’ un r\u00e9seau de carri\u00e8res<\/a>, \u00e0 100 kilom\u00e8tres au sud d’Indianapolis, serait utilis\u00e9 pour le test.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

« Timothy Baer of the Bloomington Peace Action Coalition told 25 journalists at the Monroe County Public Library on Friday that he believes the military plans to use the quarry for the Divine Strake. The test could help develop weapons to penetrate hardened, deeply buried targets.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» \u00ab\u00a0This is the largest conventional explosion ever,\u00a0\u00bb Baer said. \u00ab\u00a0The explosion could harm the region’s underlying cave system,\u00a0\u00bb Baer said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» \u00ab\u00a0It’s likely going to do irreparable damage,\u00a0\u00bb he said.<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 30 août 2006 \u00e0 15H58<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Qui contr\u00f4le encore Divine Strake ? Divine Strake, le grand programme d’une gigantesque explosion conventionnelle souterraine, poursuit son chemin. Apr\u00e8s le Nevada, c’est l’Indiana qui est en alerte. Les projets de la monstrueuse explosion de 700 tonnes d’explosif ont \u00e9t\u00e9 retard\u00e9s d’un an (de 2006 \u00e0 2007) et ont migr\u00e9 du Nevada vers (peut-\u00eatre) l’Indiana.… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2623,5274,5848,5275],"class_list":["post-67942","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-bureaucratie","tag-divine","tag-indiana","tag-strake"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67942","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67942"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67942\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67942"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67942"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67942"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}