Antiwar.com<\/em>, fait le compte des interventions, commentaires et prises de position qui vont dans ce sens. La politique unilat\u00e9raliste de GW au Moyen-Orient est mise en cause \u00e0 Washington, certes, ce qui n’est pas vraiment nouveau. Ce qui l’est, c’est l’\u00e9volution en cours \u00e0 Tel Aviv.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tLobe remarque justement que cette mise en cause s’exerce directement sur la politique (la non-politique) de Bush vis-\u00e0-vis de la Syrie (isolement ou attaque de la Syrie), tandis que nombre de personnalit\u00e9s isra\u00e9liennes expriment leur int\u00e9r\u00eat pour des n\u00e9gociations avec la Syrie. La logique conduit \u00e0 une mise en cause plus g\u00e9n\u00e9rale.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00ab Meanwhile, other prominent Israelis are asking even more basic questions about the regional strategy pursued by Bush and its consequences for Israel.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb In a column published by the Ha’aretz newspaper last week, former Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben-Ami argued that, in the aftermath of the Lebanon war, which, in his view, had proven the limits of [Israeli] power, a peace accord with Syria and the Palestinians had become essential for Israel, particularly in light of the worrisome decline of the status of Israel’s ally in this part of the world and beyond.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb U.S. deterrence, and respect for the superpower have been eroded unrecognizably, he wrote. An exclusive Pax Americana in the Middle East is no longer possible because not only is the U.S. not an inspiration today, it does not instill fear.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb Indeed, the widespread perception that Washington’s influence in the region has fallen sharply as a result of both the war in Iraq and the administration’s stubborn refusal to engage its foes diplomatically has raised new questions about whether Bush and his neoconservative advisers have actually made Israel less rather than more secure.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb [The] Bush administration at first avoided and then was unable to deliver the diplomatic agility that was called for, and that is bad news for Israel, wrote former Israeli peace negotiator Daniel Levy in this week’s Forward. The United States had no direct channels to or leverage with key actors, and could not commit troops to any cease-fire implementation force.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bb The idea that current American policy advances Israeli security and national interests is thoroughly discredited something that is now openly aired in the Israeli media, and raised, albeit in more discreet circles, by Israeli Cabinet ministers, according to Levy, who currently directs the NAF’s and Century Foundation’s Middle East Initiative.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 31 ao\u00fbt 2006 \u00e0 10H31<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Les retomb\u00e9es du conflit entre Isra\u00ebl et le Hezbollah commencent \u00e0 s’\u00e9claircir. Le choc caus\u00e9 par cet affrontement et par l’\u00e9chec isra\u00e9lien commence \u00e0 faire sentir ses effets. Peut-\u00eatre en vient-on \u00e0 l’essentiel qui est, pour Isra\u00ebl, l’entame d’une mise en cause de son alliance inconditionnelle avec Washington. Jim Lobe, ce matin sur Antiwar.com, fait… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2774,2697,3867],"class_list":["post-67943","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-israel","tag-negociations","tag-syrie"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67943","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67943"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67943\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67943"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67943"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67943"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}