{"id":67948,"date":"2006-09-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-09-01T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/09\/01\/la-grande-reference-de-levolution-decisive-de-lamerique\/"},"modified":"2006-09-01T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-09-01T00:00:00","slug":"la-grande-reference-de-levolution-decisive-de-lamerique","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/09\/01\/la-grande-reference-de-levolution-decisive-de-lamerique\/","title":{"rendered":"La grande r\u00e9f\u00e9rence de l&rsquo;\u00e9volution d\u00e9cisive de l&rsquo;Am\u00e9rique"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Dans un court texte tr\u00e8s critique, dans <em>The Guardian<\/em> du <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.guardian.co.uk\/news\/archives\/2006\/08\/31\/spinning_the_bullets.html\" class=\"gen\">31 ao\u00fbt<\/a>, David Fickling rapproche justement le <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.guardian.co.uk\/news\/archives\/2006\/08\/31\/spinning_the_bullets.html\" class=\"gen\">discours<\/a> de Rumsfeld du 29 ao\u00fbt et l&rsquo;appel d&rsquo;offre du Pentagone pour une <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3105\" class=\"gen\">autre r\u00e9alit\u00e9<\/a>, en toute libert\u00e9 <em>please<\/em>, que la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 chiante et qui tache des dizaines de morts par jour en Irak.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tDans son discours Rumsfeld reproche \u00e0 l&rsquo;opposition \u00e0 la guerre en Irak de s&rsquo;opposer \u00e0 la guerre en Irak, notamment parce qu&rsquo;elle s&rsquo;attache un peu trop \u00e0 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9. Il faut montrer un peu de maturit\u00e9, <em>please<\/em>. Par cons\u00e9quent, la bureaucratie de Rumsfeld, ex\u00e9cutant les ordres du patron avec la tr\u00e8s grande subtilit\u00e9 qu&rsquo;on lui conna\u00eet, fait un appel d&rsquo;offre pour une autre r\u00e9alit\u00e9, plus convenable, plus sympa, moins capitularde <em>circa<\/em> ann\u00e9es trente. Le lien de cause \u00e0 effet est aussi net que la ligne dans le sable trac\u00e9e par papa-Bush 15 ans auparavant, pour justifier l&rsquo;invasion de l&rsquo;Irak. Bref, ce sont les guerriers virtualistes en pleine h\u00e9ro\u00efque besogne.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tFickling s&#8217;emporte : \u00ab <em>It seems incredible, but on a day when at least 52 people were killed in bomb and gun attacks in Iraq after three years of chaos and insurgency, the US has concluded that its problem in the country is one of bad publicity.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPlus loin dans son texte, Fickling se fait plus investigateur. Il a l&rsquo;id\u00e9e tr\u00e8s int\u00e9ressante de se r\u00e9f\u00e9rer \u00e0 un texte important : \u00ab <em>You can find the roots of this attitude in the sincere belief among many American conservatives that the media should be used as a partisan tool to advance their political ends  an attitude encapsulated in the infamous Nixon-era memo by late Supreme Court judge Lewis Powell, seen by many as the seed from which the modern conservative media backlash has grown.<\/em> \u00bb Il s&rsquo;agit effectivement de ce m\u00e9mo Powell dont nous avions <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=353\" class=\"gen\">parl\u00e9<\/a> <em>in illo tempore<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tFickling termine par une observation qui nous ram\u00e8ne \u00e0 nos supputations autour de ce cher vieux virtualisme : \u00ab  <em>The fact that Washington seems to believe its own propaganda, blaming the media for all this seems astonishing. But as US social theorist Eric Hoffer pointed out, propaganda doesn&rsquo;t so much deceive people, as help them to deceive themselves.<\/em> \u00bb Rapprocher le virtualisme du m\u00e9mo Powell, celui-ci \u00e9tant un des outils principaux pour mettre en place ce m\u00eame virtualisme par l&rsquo;interm\u00e9diaire de l&rsquo;investissement d&rsquo;un certain nombre de moyens de communication, est une id\u00e9e qui a sans aucun doute sa valeur. Pour prolonger ce constat, et dans la mesure o\u00f9 nous faisons nous-m\u00eames du m\u00e9mo Powell la <em>road map<\/em> de la privatisation de l&rsquo;Am\u00e9rique, on observera que la mise en place du virtualisme a un lien direct avec la r\u00e9duction acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9e de la centralit\u00e9, pourtant r\u00e9duite (avec un aspect r\u00e9galien \u00e9galement r\u00e9duit mais tout de m\u00eame existant), qui caract\u00e9risait l&rsquo;action du gouvernement depuis Franklin D. Roosevelt jusqu&rsquo;\u00e0 Johnson dans les ann\u00e9es 1960.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEffectivement, le virtualisme est li\u00e9 \u00e0 la r\u00e9duction acc\u00e9l\u00e9r\u00e9e du r\u00f4le r\u00e9galien du gouvernement, jusqu&rsquo;\u00e0 sa r\u00e9duction comme simple m\u00e9canique de blanchiment de l&rsquo;argent public redirig\u00e9 vers les int\u00e9r\u00eats priv\u00e9s (taxation, imp\u00f4ts, redistribu\u00e9s par le biais de contrats \u00e9normes et compl\u00e8tement abusifs vers le <em>corporate power<\/em>, le complexe militaro-industriel, les diverses industries subventionnant le monde politique).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 1er septembre 2006 \u00e0 18H05<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dans un court texte tr\u00e8s critique, dans The Guardian du 31 ao\u00fbt, David Fickling rapproche justement le discours de Rumsfeld du 29 ao\u00fbt et l&rsquo;appel d&rsquo;offre du Pentagone pour une autre r\u00e9alit\u00e9, en toute libert\u00e9 please, que la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 chiante et qui tache des dizaines de morts par jour en Irak. Dans son discours Rumsfeld&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4610,1391,569,610],"class_list":["post-67948","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-memo","tag-powell","tag-rumsfeld","tag-virtualisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67948","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67948"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67948\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67948"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}