{"id":67950,"date":"2006-09-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-09-02T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/09\/02\/lefficace-mexicain-desordre-legal-de-amlo\/"},"modified":"2006-09-02T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-09-02T00:00:00","slug":"lefficace-mexicain-desordre-legal-de-amlo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/09\/02\/lefficace-mexicain-desordre-legal-de-amlo\/","title":{"rendered":"L’efficace & mexicain \u201cd\u00e9sordre l\u00e9gal\u201d de AMLO"},"content":{"rendered":"

L’efficace & mexicain \u00ab\u00a0d\u00e9sordre l\u00e9gal\u00a0\u00bb de AMLO<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n

Le pr\u00e9sident mexicain sortant Vicente Fox devait pr\u00e9senter hier son discours sur l’Etat de la nation, normalement le dernier du genre avant sa succession. Mais succession par qui ? L’\u00e9tat de \u00ab\u00a0d\u00e9sordre l\u00e9gal\u00a0\u00bb où s’enfonce le Mexique apr\u00e8s l’\u00e9lection contest\u00e9e du 2 juillet a \u00e9t\u00e9 marqu\u00e9 par l’impossibilit\u00e9 pour Fox de parler. Au Congr\u00e8s mexicain, où le discours a normalement lieu, une intervention de parlementaires de l’opposition sur l’estrade où devait parler le pr\u00e9sident a emp\u00each\u00e9 la c\u00e9r\u00e9monie.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Selon Fortwayne.com<\/em> et AP<\/a>, aujourd’hui :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\n

« Vicente Fox was forced to forego the last state-of-the-nation address of his presidency Friday after leftist lawmakers stormed the stage of Congress to protest disputed July 2 elections.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» It was the first time in modern Mexican history a president hasn’t given the annual address to Congress. Instead, Fox handed in a written copy of his report, and his office said he would address the nation in a televised speech later Friday.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» A text of the speech Fox had planned to deliver to Congress called on Mexico to mend deep divisions that he said threatened the country’s newfound democracy. \u00ab\u00a0Whoever attacks our laws and institutions also attacks our history and Mexico,\u00a0\u00bb he said, a thinly veiled reference to leftist presidential candidate Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador<\/em> [AMLO].<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

» The opposition lawmakers took over the stage in Congress, waving Mexican flags and holding placards calling Fox a traitor to democracy. They ignored demands that they return to their seats, shouting ‘Vote by Vote’ — a rallying cry for Lopez Obrador’s bid for a full recount in the election. They raised up leather-bound copies of the Mexican Constitution and flashed the victory sign. Fox left without entering the congressional chamber and the session was adjourned.<\/em> »<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

L’\u00e9v\u00e9nement est une marque importante de cet \u00e9trange \u00ab\u00a0d\u00e9sordre l\u00e9gal\u00a0\u00bb qui est en train d’envahir la vie publique mexicaine avec le blocage qui suit l’\u00e9lection du 2 juillet. Le Congr\u00e8s \u00e9tait prot\u00e9g\u00e9 par 6.000 policiers face \u00e0 des manifestants pro-Lopez Obrador, le candidat de gauche qui conteste les r\u00e9sultats de l’\u00e9lection. Il n’y a pas eu de violence mais l’intervention des d\u00e9put\u00e9s de l’opposition a fait de la journ\u00e9e un succ\u00e8s pour Lopez Obrador.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Le d\u00e9sordre est en train de s’installer au Mexique, avec jusqu’ici un minimum de violence, ce qui est caract\u00e9ristique de l’ambigu\u00eft\u00e9<\/a> de la situation. C’est une application de la tactique de Lopez Obrador qui, plut\u00f4t que contester les structures officielles en place qui favorisent le candidat conservateur Calderon, cherche \u00e0 installer des contre-structures op\u00e9rant une sorte de ‘l\u00e9galisation’ de sa propre situation. La journ\u00e9e d’hier marque la gravit\u00e9 et le s\u00e9rieux de la situation g\u00e9n\u00e9rale et fait penser qu’il sera extr\u00eamement difficile d’en terminer par la seule validation du r\u00e9sultat officiel de Calderon. Elle mesure aussi des \u00e9v\u00e9nements, tr\u00e8s typiques des situations posmodernistes. Les conditions g\u00e9n\u00e9rales, avec la globalisation, la corruption et l’affaiblissement de la classe politique, font que la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 devient quelque chose de tr\u00e8s incertain, de tr\u00e8s mouvant, de tr\u00e8s insaisissable. On paraphrase la formule : ce n’est plus \u00ab\u00a0le pouvoir est \u00e0 prendre\u00a0\u00bb mais \u00ab\u00a0la l\u00e9galit\u00e9 est \u00e0 prendre\u00a0\u00bb.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

Mis en ligne le 2 septembre 2006 \u00e0 09H26<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

L’efficace & mexicain \u00ab\u00a0d\u00e9sordre l\u00e9gal\u00a0\u00bb de AMLO Le pr\u00e9sident mexicain sortant Vicente Fox devait pr\u00e9senter hier son discours sur l’Etat de la nation, normalement le dernier du genre avant sa succession. Mais succession par qui ? L’\u00e9tat de \u00ab\u00a0d\u00e9sordre l\u00e9gal\u00a0\u00bb où s’enfonce le Mexique apr\u00e8s l’\u00e9lection contest\u00e9e du 2 juillet a \u00e9t\u00e9 marqu\u00e9 par l’impossibilit\u00e9… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3356,3288,5854,5853,2943,4604],"class_list":["post-67950","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-desordre","tag-fox","tag-legal","tag-lopez","tag-mexique","tag-obrador"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67950","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67950"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67950\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67950"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67950"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67950"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}