{"id":67979,"date":"2006-09-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-09-10T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/09\/10\/cinq-ans-plus-tard-question-sur-911-comment-peuvent-ils-se-poser-encore-cette-question\/"},"modified":"2006-09-10T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-09-10T00:00:00","slug":"cinq-ans-plus-tard-question-sur-911-comment-peuvent-ils-se-poser-encore-cette-question","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/09\/10\/cinq-ans-plus-tard-question-sur-911-comment-peuvent-ils-se-poser-encore-cette-question\/","title":{"rendered":"Cinq ans plus tard, question sur 9\/11: comment peuvent-ils se poser encore cette question ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Le 5\u00e8me anniversaire de l&rsquo;attaque du 11 septembre 2001, d\u00e9j\u00e0 largement entam\u00e9 dans les m\u00e9dias, r\u00e9v\u00e8le cette ann\u00e9e un \u00e9tat d&rsquo;esprit interrogatif, incertain, \u00e9videmment bien \u00e0 l&rsquo;image du temps historique que nous vivons.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tUne s\u00e9quence nous a particuli\u00e8rement fascin\u00e9s pour ce qu&rsquo;elle exprime d&rsquo;incapacit\u00e9 fondamentale, de la part du c\u00f4t\u00e9 US, \u00e0 seulement <strong>comprendre<\/strong> la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 de la situation. Apr\u00e8s ces cinq ann\u00e9es depuis 2001 et avec tout ce qui a pr\u00e9c\u00e9d\u00e9 \u00e0 cette lumi\u00e8re d\u00e9sormais, toutes choses que devrait conna\u00eetre un ancien parlementaire aussi chevronn\u00e9 que Lee Hamilton (ancien pr\u00e9sident de la commission des affaires \u00e9trang\u00e8res de la Chambre des Repr\u00e9sentants), la question que se pose sans arr\u00eat ce m\u00eame et pauvre Hamilton, sans trouver de r\u00e9ponse, a de quoi soulever bien des questions.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe Washington <em>Times<\/em>, qui l&rsquo;interroge dans un long article <a href=\"http:\/\/insider.washingtontimes.com\/articles\/normal.php?StoryID=20060910-122212-7726r\" class=\"gen\">aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a>, d\u00e9taille diverses questions dont il juge qu&rsquo;elles sont sans r\u00e9ponse C&rsquo;est \u00e0 la derni\u00e8re que s&rsquo;attache Lee Hamilton.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>What motivated 19 relatively well-off Arab men, all Muslims, to become such horrific suicide bombers?<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Lee Hamilton, vice chairman of the national September 11 commission, says motivation was the big question the panel could not answer.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>We were never able to answer why the 19 were willing to kill themselves. What was the motivation? I am talking in a very personal way, Mr. Hamilton, a Democrat who represented Indiana&rsquo;s 9th District in the House for 34 years, said in an interview wih The Washington Times.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>What was the motivation for each one of these hijackers? I think the question of motivation was opaque to us. We just could not nail it. They were dead, of course.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>He said investigators guessed at a religious motive or a political grievance against the West, or more specifically the United States.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Why do they hate us? It&rsquo;s one of the fundamental questions raised again and again, Mr. Hamilton said. We couldn&rsquo;t pin it down for the 19.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 10 septembre 2006 \u00e0 13H39<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Le 5\u00e8me anniversaire de l&rsquo;attaque du 11 septembre 2001, d\u00e9j\u00e0 largement entam\u00e9 dans les m\u00e9dias, r\u00e9v\u00e8le cette ann\u00e9e un \u00e9tat d&rsquo;esprit interrogatif, incertain, \u00e9videmment bien \u00e0 l&rsquo;image du temps historique que nous vivons. Une s\u00e9quence nous a particuli\u00e8rement fascin\u00e9s pour ce qu&rsquo;elle exprime d&rsquo;incapacit\u00e9 fondamentale, de la part du c\u00f4t\u00e9 US, \u00e0 seulement comprendre la&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[354,370,3897,5126,2852,3248],"class_list":["post-67979","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-354","tag-370","tag-hamilton","tag-question","tag-times","tag-washington"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67979","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67979"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67979\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67979"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}