{"id":67983,"date":"2006-09-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-09-11T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/09\/11\/apres-la-decision-du-tepjf-la-marche-du-mexique-vers-un-desordre-postmoderne\/"},"modified":"2006-09-11T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-09-11T00:00:00","slug":"apres-la-decision-du-tepjf-la-marche-du-mexique-vers-un-desordre-postmoderne","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/09\/11\/apres-la-decision-du-tepjf-la-marche-du-mexique-vers-un-desordre-postmoderne\/","title":{"rendered":"Apr\u00e8s la d\u00e9cision du TEPJF, la marche du Mexique vers un d\u00e9sordre postmoderne"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>La d\u00e9cision du tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral mexicain (TEPJF) sur l&rsquo;\u00e9lection m\u00e9rite d&rsquo;\u00eatre examin\u00e9e de pr\u00e8s. Elle l&rsquo;est par le site <em>WSWS.org<\/em> ce <a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsws.org\/articles\/2006\/sep2006\/mexi-s11.shtml\" class=\"gen\">11 septembre<\/a>. On s&rsquo;aper\u00e7oit que la d\u00e9marche du TEPJF est explosive en ce que la d\u00e9cision rendue reste tr\u00e8s ambigu\u00eb, g\u00e9n\u00e9ratrice ou acc\u00e9l\u00e9ratrice de la col\u00e8re et de la contestation.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t<em>WSWS.org<\/em> expose notamment :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>The court was unable to give a clear and unambiguous answer to who actually won the popular vote. In a ruling that singled out the Federal Elections Institute for procedures that facilitated fraud, the seven-member TEPJF simply indicated that it did not have enough information to confirm that, absent the many irregularities, the outcome would have been different. The tribunal also singled out President Vicente Fox and Mexican corporate interests for engaging in practices that were unjust and a source of concern to manipulate the vote. It added, however, that it considered these practices to be isolated events with no determining effect on the results of the vote.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The finding was immediately welcomed by the PAN, which downplayed the TEPJF&rsquo;s criticisms. Also indifferent to the TEPJF&rsquo;s language were US President George Bush, Latin American leadersincluding Argentina&rsquo;s Nestor Kirchner and Chile&rsquo;s Socialist Party President Michelle Bacheletand Paul Wolfowitz of the World Bank. Calder\u00f3n reported that he spoke at length with Bush on the issue of immigration. Wolfowitz advised the Mexican government to attend to the needs of the poor, but without taxing the rich; instead he recommended an acceleration of the neo-liberal policies that have been responsible for Mexico&rsquo;s social and economic crisis.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The Institutionalist Revolutionary Party (PRI), the party that ruled Mexico uninterruptedly from 1929 to 2000, accepted the decision. PRI spokesperson Carlos Jimenez Mac\u00edas declared that the TEJPF&rsquo;s ruling left a foul taste in one&rsquo;s mouth, but we will go along with it. PRI congressional leader Malio Fabio Beltrones expressed dissatisfaction with the lack of fairness of the July 2 elections and called for legislation to prevent corporate interests from manipulating the vote.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>PRD leaders indicated that they would appeal to human rights organizations in Europe, Asia and Latin America. Typical of the PRD response was the statement by Senator Ricardo Monreal that this finding deepens the political crisis; the opposition and hatred that it engenders will feed repudiation and distrust&#8230;. In the same manner that nobody governs for long sitting on bayonets, nobody can last on the basis of a failed judicial decision.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Questions were raised about the legitimacy of the TEJPF itself. Porfirio Mu\u00f1oz Ledo, a former PRI official and ambassador to the UN, who also served as ambassador to the European Union for Fox, charged that President Fox had met with the members of the TEJPF and pressured them to certify Calder\u00f3n, on the grounds that any other decision would result in a political and economic catastrophe in Mexico. Government officials denounced Mu\u00f1oz as a liar; but the politiciannow a L\u00f3pez supporterinsists that he has good evidence from the court itself that the meeting took place.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Further suspicion was cast on the entire election when the Federal Elections Institute announced that it would deny Mexico City&rsquo;s prestigious political journal El Proceso access to the ballots, and instead would move to destroy them.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Popular hostility to Calder\u00f3n is evident wherever he goes. During a visit to Morelia, capital of Michoacan State, he was hounded by L\u00f3pez Obrador supporters who prevented him from speaking at several events. Michoacan is a PRD stronghold whose governor Cuahutemoc C\u00e1rdenas Bartlett, accepted the TEJPF&rsquo;s decision.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tBien entendu, Lopez Obrador entend poursuivre son action qui pourrait aboutir \u00e0 la mise en place d&rsquo;une deuxi\u00e8me structure de gouvernement concurrente de la premi\u00e8re, ce qui imposerait une situation sans r\u00e9el pr\u00e9c\u00e9dent. De cette fa\u00e7on, tout para\u00eet en place pour une crise majeure au Mexique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl est significatif que, malgr\u00e9 la position hostile aux oligarchies majoritaires soutenues par les USA d&rsquo;Obrador, <em>WSWS.org<\/em> continue \u00e0 marquer la plus forte suspicion \u00e0 son encontre. Obrador continue \u00e0 \u00eatre repr\u00e9sent\u00e9 comme le repr\u00e9sentant d&rsquo;oligarchies dissidentes, ce qui est d&rsquo;ailleurs proche de la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 et rend la situation encore plus originale,  mais <em>WSWS.org<\/em> n&rsquo;a pas l&rsquo;air de go\u00fbter cette originalit\u00e9. Vis-\u00e0-vis d&rsquo;Obrador, le site trotskiste montre une attitude de stricte orthodoxie r\u00e9volutionnaire qui para\u00eet un peu d\u00e9pass\u00e9e.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>L\u00f3pez Obrador&rsquo;s program of modest concessions to the poor is based on sensitivity to the de-stabilizing consequences of the social and economic policies promoted by both Calder\u00f3n&rsquo;s PAN and the PRI since the late 1970s. He is representative of dissident and more farsighted groups within the ruling elite that view with alarm the potential for the instability implicit in this social and economic crisis plunging the nation into revolutionary struggles, threatening capitalism itself.<\/em> () <em>L\u00f3pez Obrador is playing the role of sorcerer&rsquo;s apprentice, attempting to mobilize and control powerful social forces, driven by long pent-up demands for jobs, a genuine land reform, an equitable distribution of income and wealth, and decent living standards, including health and education and retirementdemands that cannot be fulfilled outside of a direct revolutionary challenge to Mexican and global capitalism.<\/em> \u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 11 septembre 2006 \u00e0 11H01<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La d\u00e9cision du tribunal f\u00e9d\u00e9ral mexicain (TEPJF) sur l&rsquo;\u00e9lection m\u00e9rite d&rsquo;\u00eatre examin\u00e9e de pr\u00e8s. Elle l&rsquo;est par le site WSWS.org ce 11 septembre. On s&rsquo;aper\u00e7oit que la d\u00e9marche du TEPJF est explosive en ce que la d\u00e9cision rendue reste tr\u00e8s ambigu\u00eb, g\u00e9n\u00e9ratrice ou acc\u00e9l\u00e9ratrice de la col\u00e8re et de la contestation. WSWS.org expose notamment :&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2943,4604,5248,5880],"class_list":["post-67983","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-mexique","tag-obrador","tag-oligarchie","tag-tepjf"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67983","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67983"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67983\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67983"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67983"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67983"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}