{"id":67999,"date":"2006-09-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-09-16T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/09\/16\/le-vent-tourne-la-realite-revient\/"},"modified":"2006-09-16T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-09-16T00:00:00","slug":"le-vent-tourne-la-realite-revient","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/09\/16\/le-vent-tourne-la-realite-revient\/","title":{"rendered":"Le vent tourne, la \u201cr\u00e9alit\u00e9\u201d revient"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Finalement, la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 commence \u00e0 prendre le dessus \u00e0 Washington et \u00e0 Tel Aviv. La r\u00e9alit\u00e9, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire l&rsquo;interpr\u00e9tation de la deuxi\u00e8me guerre du Liban qui fait de ce conflit pas loin d&rsquo;un succ\u00e8s d&rsquo;Isra\u00ebl. D&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, on sait que ce conflit a mis en \u00e9vidence des faiblesses consid\u00e9rables de l&rsquo;arm\u00e9e isra\u00e9lienne et qu&rsquo;il a \u00e9t\u00e9 aussit\u00f4t consid\u00e9r\u00e9,  relativement aux buts recherch\u00e9s et \u00e0 la r\u00e9putation de <em>Tsahal<\/em>  comme une s\u00e9v\u00e8re d\u00e9faite pour Isra\u00ebl.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tCe n&rsquo;est plus le cas. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tSelon le commentateur de <em>Haaretz<\/em> Shmuel Rosner, en date du <a href=\"http:\/\/www.haaretz.com\/hasen\/pages\/rosnerBlog.jhtml?itemNo=762946&#038;contrassID=25&#038;subContrassID=0&#038;sbSubContrassID=1&#038;listSrc=Y&#038;art=1\" class=\"gen\">15 septembre<\/a> :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Far removed from the military and political squabbles rocking Israel, something has changed in the way Washington leaders are assessing the outcome of the Lebanon war.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The war is no longer seen as a failure, but as an achievement and even a success. The terms are still cautious, but American diplomats are describing the progress in Lebanon optimistically.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>A senior State Department official told Haaretz on Wednesday that U.S. President George W. Bush and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice&rsquo;s promises to change the status quo were fast becoming a reality. There is a chance to change the atmosphere, he said.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>This sentiment was echoed in Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni&rsquo;s talks with Bush and Rice and, to a certain extent, with Vice President Dick Cheney.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>On Wednesday morning, before Livni began her meetings, Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs David Welch spoke optimistically about the war in the Senate Foreign Committee.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>He told the senators that the new rules laid down by the Security Council in Resolution 1701 would change the situation in Lebanon and the region for the better and would more than meet our standard of no return to the status quo ante.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The senior official said the way the Security Council handled the issue so far indicated that other resolutions would also be promoted in the next few weeks, including the release of Israeli prisoners of war.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLes raisons de ce changement d&rsquo;\u00e9valuation de la guerre sont diverses. La plus \u00e9vidente est tout de m\u00eame \u00e9nonc\u00e9e par le commentateur cit\u00e9, et il est int\u00e9ressant de la mentionner bien qu&rsquo;elle soit de la cat\u00e9gorie de l&rsquo;enfoncement des portes ouvertes : \u00ab<em>Israeli Foreign Ministry officials believe much of the criticism derives from certain politicians&rsquo; excessively high expectations at the beginning of the war. Some see the administration&rsquo;s positive tone as the need of senior administration officials to find retroactive justification for their support of the war. Had the war been a failure, it would have been their failure, as well.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tD&rsquo;autres sont bien douteuses, sinon franchement surr\u00e9alistes comme celle qui laisse entendre que la guerre a affaibli le Hezbollah: \u00ab<em>There is an overall change for the better in the international community&rsquo;s attitude and a real awakening regarding Hezbollah and its Iranian patrons, a senior Israeli Foreign Ministry official said.<\/em>\u00bb D&rsquo;autres, encore, utilisent largement la langue de bois internationale comme celle qui nous signale que de plus en plus de pays proclament qu&rsquo;il faut d\u00e9sarmer le Hezbollah, tout en ajoutant,  salut au r\u00e9alisme,  qu&rsquo;on ne sait comment faire : \u00ab[Israel&rsquo;s Foreign Affairs ministry] <em>Livni met several European ministers before coming to Washington and will meet others in New York next week. Most of them appear to agree that neutralizing Hezbollah is vital for Lebanon&rsquo;s stabilization. It does not follow, however, that the parties agree on how exactly to accomplish this goal.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tIl reste que, d&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, nous sommes en bonne voie pour faire de la <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3035\" class=\"gen\">d\u00e9faite<\/a> une victoire et, ainsi, pouvoir songer \u00e0 de nouvelles guerres.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 16 septembre 2006 \u00e0 21H23<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Finalement, la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 commence \u00e0 prendre le dessus \u00e0 Washington et \u00e0 Tel Aviv. La r\u00e9alit\u00e9, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire l&rsquo;interpr\u00e9tation de la deuxi\u00e8me guerre du Liban qui fait de ce conflit pas loin d&rsquo;un succ\u00e8s d&rsquo;Isra\u00ebl. D&rsquo;une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale, on sait que ce conflit a mis en \u00e9vidence des faiblesses consid\u00e9rables de l&rsquo;arm\u00e9e isra\u00e9lienne et qu&rsquo;il a&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[2774,5899,610],"class_list":["post-67999","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-israel","tag-realite","tag-virtualisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67999","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=67999"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67999\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=67999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=67999"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=67999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}