{"id":68022,"date":"2006-09-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-09-23T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/09\/23\/nous-vous-bombarder-back-to-the-stone-age-mais-ce-nest-pas-notre-genre\/"},"modified":"2006-09-23T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-09-23T00:00:00","slug":"nous-vous-bombarder-back-to-the-stone-age-mais-ce-nest-pas-notre-genre","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/09\/23\/nous-vous-bombarder-back-to-the-stone-age-mais-ce-nest-pas-notre-genre\/","title":{"rendered":"Nous, vous bombarder \u201c<em>back to the Stone Age<\/em>\u201d? Mais ce n&rsquo;est pas notre genre!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>GW a \u00e9t\u00e9, para\u00eet-il, choqu\u00e9, pein\u00e9 et m\u00eame furieux d&rsquo;apprendre, en lisant la presse, qu&rsquo;on (Richard Armitage) avait menac\u00e9 de bombarder le Pakistan, un si vieil ami. Car c&rsquo;est bien en lisant la presse que GW a appris l&rsquo;affreuse nouvelle : \u00ab<em> President Bush said he was taken aback when he read the claim in this morning&rsquo;s newspapers.<\/em>\u00bb (Nouvelle pour nous aussi : on en \u00e9tait rest\u00e9 \u00e0 l&rsquo;id\u00e9e que GW Bush ne lisait pas la presse, se jugeant suffisamment inform\u00e9 par les JT et les m\u00e9mos que lui envoient les divers services habilit\u00e9s \u00e0 ce genre de sport.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tWashington est singuli\u00e8rement contrit des <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=3179\" class=\"gen\">r\u00e9v\u00e9lations<\/a> de son ami, le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Musharraf, du Pakistan, concernant les menaces prof\u00e9r\u00e9es par Richard Armitage \u00ab<em>to bomb his country back into the Stone Age<\/em>\u00bb. (Armitage, entre-temps, a d&rsquo;abord confirm\u00e9 qu&rsquo;il avait bien menac\u00e9 le Pakistan sous une forme ou une autre, mais qu&rsquo;il n&rsquo;avait pas garanti qu&rsquo;on ram\u00e8nerait le pays \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00c2ge de pierre. Puis sa version s&rsquo;est encore \u00e9dulcor\u00e9e.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tBref, Washington a diablement paniqu\u00e9 devant la sortie de Musharraf. Washington n&rsquo;a plus aujourd&rsquo;hui beaucoup d&rsquo;alli\u00e9s et, s&rsquo;il lui reste des bombardiers valides, il n&rsquo;a plus sa superbe militaire de septembre 2001. D&rsquo;o\u00f9 cet exercice de haute voltige de d\u00e9menti patelin et amical de toutes les fa\u00e7ons. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tLe <em>Times<\/em>, d\u00e9j\u00e0 cit\u00e9 plus haut, nous <a href=\"http:\/\/www.timesonline.co.uk\/article\/0,,25689-2370604,00.html\" class=\"gen\">donne<\/a> quelques indications sur cet aspect de la pol\u00e9mique :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>Later, when asked about General Musharraf&rsquo;s comment during a joint press conference with the Pakistani President, Mr Bush said he knew nothing of the alleged threat and that Pakistan had been one of America&rsquo;s earliest and closest allies in the war in Afghanistan.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>The first I heard of this was when I read it in the newspaper today and I was taken aback by the harshness of the words, he said, referring to the controversy as the Armitage thing.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Mr Armitage has also denied General Musharraf&rsquo;s claim, although when asked what the former Deputy Secretary of State might have said, Mr Snow said today: I don&rsquo;t know. This could have been a classic failure to communicate. I just don&rsquo;t know.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Documents showed that Mr Armitage met the Pakistani Ambassador and the visiting head of Pakistan&rsquo;s military intelligence service in Washington on September 13, 2001. Mr Armitage, who has admitted being the source in the CIA leak inquiry, left office in 2005.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>General Musharraf made the allegation in an interview with CBS television last night which is due to be broadcast in America on Sunday. The intelligence director told me that [Armitage] said, Be prepared to be bombed. Be prepared to go back to the Stone Age&rsquo;, he told CBS&rsquo;s 60 Minutes&rsquo; programme. I think it was a very rude remark.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Today General Musharraf declined to comment on the remark, saying, to laughter from the press corps, that he was bound to silence by his contract with Simon and Schuster, the publishing house. The President&rsquo;s memoir, In the Line of Fire, is published next week and will be serialised in The Times from Monday.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 23 septembre 2006 \u00e0 08H59<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>GW a \u00e9t\u00e9, para\u00eet-il, choqu\u00e9, pein\u00e9 et m\u00eame furieux d&rsquo;apprendre, en lisant la presse, qu&rsquo;on (Richard Armitage) avait menac\u00e9 de bombarder le Pakistan, un si vieil ami. Car c&rsquo;est bien en lisant la presse que GW a appris l&rsquo;affreuse nouvelle : \u00ab President Bush said he was taken aback when he read the claim in&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4284,5916,5915,3379],"class_list":["post-68022","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-armitage","tag-bombarder","tag-musharraf","tag-pakistan"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68022","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68022"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68022\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68022"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68022"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68022"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}