Apr\u00e8s les remous qui ont accompagn\u00e9 les r\u00e9v\u00e9lations du pr\u00e9sident pakistanais, le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Musharraf, sur la fa\u00e7on<\/a> dont fut trait\u00e9 son pays par les Am\u00e9ricains aussit\u00f4t apr\u00e8s le 11 septembre 2001, il y a eu des r\u00e9actions au Pakistan m\u00eame. Une d\u00e9p\u00eache AP, relay\u00e9e par The State.com<\/a> en donne un exemple :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00abA report that the United States purportedly threatened military action against Pakistan shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks drew a sharp response and some protest in Pakistan Friday.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbA spokesman for Pakistan’s largest hard-line Islamic group predicted the issue would further enrage ordinary Pakistanis, who have long believed that they were forced at gunpoint into supporting the war on terror.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n \t\u00bbThe temperature and anger will rise among Pakistanis because they will see that the Americans do not want dialogue or communication, but are instead exploiting a situation and compelling (Pakistani leader Gen. Pervez) Musharraf to support them, said Ameer ul-Azeem, of the opposition Islamic coalition Mutahida Majlis-e-Amal, also called MMA.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tBien \u00e9videmment, les islamistes sont tr\u00e8s critiques de l’attitude de Musharraf, mais le principal impact de ses d\u00e9clarations est sans aucun doute la perception de la faiblesse consid\u00e9rable des liens entre les USA et le Pakistan. La m\u00eame d\u00e9p\u00eache AP observe, rapportant le commentaire d’un expert sur les circonstances rapport\u00e9es par Musharraf : \u00abThese comments only expose how tenuous and fragile Pakistan’s relationship is with the United States, Pakistani analyst and retired army Gen. Talat Masood said Friday.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n \tLa question qui se pose est de savoir si le pr\u00e9sident pakistanais aurait fait de telles r\u00e9v\u00e9lations il y a deux ou trois ans, alors que la puissance US donnait encore le change dans le cadre de sa pr\u00e9sentation comme une force irr\u00e9sistible. Rien n’est moins s\u00fbr. Il est possible que l’initiative de Musharraf repr\u00e9sente une de ces tentatives, chez un homme jusqu’ici compl\u00e8tement manipul\u00e9 par Washington, de prendre ses distances des Am\u00e9ricains. Ce mouvement pourrait toucher d’autres dirigeants du m\u00eame calibre.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n <\/p>\n \tMis en ligne le 24 septembre 2006 \u00e0 17H20<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Apr\u00e8s les remous qui ont accompagn\u00e9 les r\u00e9v\u00e9lations du pr\u00e9sident pakistanais, le g\u00e9n\u00e9ral Musharraf, sur la fa\u00e7on dont fut trait\u00e9 son pays par les Am\u00e9ricains aussit\u00f4t apr\u00e8s le 11 septembre 2001, il y a eu des r\u00e9actions au Pakistan m\u00eame. Une d\u00e9p\u00eache AP, relay\u00e9e par The State.com en donne un exemple : \u00abA report that… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5915,3379,2804],"class_list":["post-68025","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-musharraf","tag-pakistan","tag-usa"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68025","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68025"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68025\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68025"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68025"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68025"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}