{"id":68041,"date":"2006-09-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-09-28T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/09\/28\/le-triomphe-de-tony-blair-lirresistible-besoin-de-nihilisme-jusquau-bout\/"},"modified":"2006-09-28T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-09-28T00:00:00","slug":"le-triomphe-de-tony-blair-lirresistible-besoin-de-nihilisme-jusquau-bout","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/09\/28\/le-triomphe-de-tony-blair-lirresistible-besoin-de-nihilisme-jusquau-bout\/","title":{"rendered":"Le triomphe de Tony Blair : l&rsquo;irr\u00e9sistible besoin de nihilisme jusqu&rsquo;au bout"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><p>Nous vous recommandons de lire le texte d&rsquo;analyse du site <em>WSWS.org<\/em> d&rsquo;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.wsws.org\/articles\/2006\/sep2006\/blai-s28.shtml\" class=\"gen\">aujourd&rsquo;hui<\/a> sur le triomphe de Tony Blair aux assises annuelles du parti travailliste. Bien qu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agisse d&rsquo;un texte officiel de la section britannique de la IV\u00e8me Internationale (<em>Statement by the Socialist Equality Party  Britain<\/em>), les assommantes lourdeurs id\u00e9ologiques sont assez rares et la finesse de l&rsquo;analyse politique est bien l\u00e0.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tEffectivement, la description faite du triomphe surr\u00e9aliste du plus calamiteux (y compris Chamberlain) Premier ministre qu&rsquo;ait connu le Royaume-Uni rend un son juste. Nous sommes dans <em>fantasyland<\/em> (voir <em>Le royaume enchant\u00e9 de Tony Blair<\/em>, de Philippe Auclair) et l&rsquo;esp\u00e8ce d&rsquo;ivresse nihiliste dans laquelle se sont pr\u00e9cipit\u00e9s les d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9s du <em>Labour<\/em> (sept minutes de <em>standing ovation<\/em> pour Blair, m\u00eame Hollywood n&rsquo;aurait pas imagin\u00e9 \u00e7a) est une bonne mesure de la folie o\u00f9 s&rsquo;ab\u00eeme le monde politique britannique. Ce fut sans aucun doute un \u00e9norme congr\u00e8s-<em>Prozak<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t(Dire que  pauvre de nous \u00e0 <em>dedefensa.org<\/em>  nous avions parfois imagin\u00e9 qu&rsquo;une mise en cause de Tony Blair pouvait na\u00eetre d&rsquo;une telle assembl\u00e9e. Preuve que <em>dedefensa.org<\/em> garde un singulier optimisme quant \u00e0 l&rsquo;\u00e9tat r\u00e9el des lieux les plus d\u00e9mocratiquement hupp\u00e9s de notre civilisation. Dont acte. Nous n&rsquo;avons jamais la critique assez vigoureuse, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire assez roborative, devant cet ectoplasme de civilisation d\u00e9mocratique qu&rsquo;on trouve dans nos assembl\u00e9es politiques, et seul le d\u00e9sordre que cr\u00e9eraient certaines initiatives pourrait effectivement <a href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=2993\" class=\"gen\">pr\u00e9cipiter les choses<\/a>. Le triomphe politique de Tony Blair, le Diable en rit encore.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\tPour une fois, laissons la politique ext\u00e9rieure surr\u00e9aliste de Blair de c\u00f4t\u00e9. Citons plut\u00f4t cette analyse juste de <em>WSWS.org<\/em> sur l&rsquo;\u00e9volution du <em>Labour<\/em> en parti situ\u00e9 d\u00e9sormais \u00e0 la droite des conservateurs, et qui pr\u00e9tend toujours \u00eatre la voix des classes laborieuses. Effectivement, l&rsquo;impasse est totale. Les applaudissements sans fin lanc\u00e9s \u00e0 Tony Blair, l&rsquo;absence de quoi que ce soit qui puisse ressembler \u00e0 une alternative, nous indiquent que le changement de la formule actuelle n&rsquo;est pas pour demain. Nous aurons donc l&rsquo;accroissement tr\u00e8s, tr\u00e8s rapide du d\u00e9sordre et de l&rsquo;impossibilit\u00e9 de gouverner le pays comme legs ind\u00e9niable du Premier ministre qui, en plus d&rsquo;\u00eatre calamiteux, a port\u00e9 le nihilisme au rang de la vertu de l&rsquo;Etat.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00ab<em>New Labour is a product of incredible political shortsightedness. Whether in office or in opposition, the Labour Party had fulfilled a political function crucial to the stability of British imperialism. It offered an alternative to the Tories and held out to working people the prospect of securing, at least in part, their social interests. It was the political wing of a multimillion-member trade union movement that promised to curb the worst excesses of capitalism and thereby guarantee decent, well-paid jobs, free education and healthcare and a living pension on retirement.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Today, the party and the unions that gave birth to it have presided over the destruction of everything with which they were once associated. Millions have deserted Labour because they recognise that the party no longer speaks for them. At present, this has taken the form of record abstentions in elections and a generalised hatred of the entire political setup. Things cannot and will not end there.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Those assembled in Manchester are hoping that a new leader and some political repackaging will rescue what they refer to as the New Labour project. They are destined to be disappointed.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>\t\u00bb<em>Continuing with the historical fiction of describing a right-wing party as Labour no longer fools anyone. Blair may like to think of himself as having heralded a new era. More truthfully, his leadership marked the definitive end of one based upon the advocacy of social reforms and other measures to ameliorate the class struggle.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><\/p>\n<p><p>\tMis en ligne le 28 septembre 2006 \u00e0 08H32<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Nous vous recommandons de lire le texte d&rsquo;analyse du site WSWS.org d&rsquo;aujourd&rsquo;hui sur le triomphe de Tony Blair aux assises annuelles du parti travailliste. Bien qu&rsquo;il s&rsquo;agisse d&rsquo;un texte officiel de la section britannique de la IV\u00e8me Internationale (Statement by the Socialist Equality Party Britain), les assommantes lourdeurs id\u00e9ologiques sont assez rares et la finesse&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[705,4184,5944,4073,3952],"class_list":["post-68041","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-blair","tag-labour","tag-nihilisme","tag-triomphe","tag-wsws"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68041","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68041"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68041\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68041"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68041"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68041"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}