secoue<\/a> Washington depuis quelques jours. Scheer critique GW Bush pour ne tenir aucun compte de l’\u00e9vidence, mise en lumi\u00e8re par la NIE, que le conflit a aliment\u00e9 le terrorisme et accru les menaces contre les USA :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abYou would think that a consensus report from all 16 U.S. intelligence services concluding that he has blown the war on terror would be a really big deal to the president. But that assumes that George W. Bush values intelligence.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbClearly, he does not. So the news that a 2006 National Intelligence Estimate concludes the threat of terror against the United States has increased since 9\/11, largely thanks to his irrational invasion of Iraq, has not disturbed Bush’s branded what me worry countenance.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tEnsuite, on a la critique du texte critique de Scheer, \u00e0 partir de la NIE elle-m\u00eame consid\u00e9r\u00e9e comme critique de la politique irakienne et de ses effets. Par exemple, ce lecteur (jkoch<\/em>), intervenant le 27 septembre :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abScheer overstates the dissent in the NIE report. Generals Eaton and Batiste also call for more, not less, US involvement in Iraq. Neither the NIE nor the generals propose any cut and run. Only Ret. Gen. Odom, who has nothing to do with post 2001 policies, has argued for anything close to that.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe NIE report is quite W<\/em> [GW Bush] friendly. It acknowledges blowbacks from the US Iraq occupation, but does not label it a mistake or call for withdrawal. It does not question a single neocon concept or premise that the world is filled with mortal enemies. Read: it says these foes might even be joined with anti-globalization or other anti-US causes (global warming, etc). It alleges infestations of secret cells everywhere. The increased dangers simply justify greater appropriations for security and defence operations: more agents, interrogators, police, inspectors, devices, detentions, weapons, and unfettered executive authority.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\tTout cela se d\u00e9fend et d\u00e9bat dans le registre de la critique, avec les diff\u00e9rentes graduations qu’on a mentionn\u00e9es. Nous pourrions avoir nous-m\u00eames notre part dans ce d\u00e9bat mais qu’importe aujourd’hui, en v\u00e9rit\u00e9 ? L’essentiel est l’effet g\u00e9n\u00e9ral produit, avec une direction enfonc\u00e9e dans l’absurde rh\u00e9torique selon laquelle la guerre en Irak a am\u00e9lior\u00e9 la s\u00e9curit\u00e9 des USA, et les attaques de tous c\u00f4t\u00e9s appuy\u00e9es sur l’\u00e9vidence du contraire.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tL’existence du Grand Mensonge initial (n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de la guerre contre l’Irak), qui est le socle m\u00eame de la rh\u00e9torique virtualiste o\u00f9 l’administration \u00e9volue, les attaques plus ou moins \u00e0 fleuret mouchet\u00e9 de la part d’opposants sensibles \u00e0 la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 mais acceptant encore une part de la description virtualiste de l’origine de la guerre, jusqu’\u00e0 ceux qui rejettent tout au nom d’une critique totale, tout cela cr\u00e9e le spectacle d’un extraordinaire tourbillon de contradictions sans fin.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tLe d\u00e9sordre washingtonien, \u00e9voluant entre une paradoxale paralysie et une hyst\u00e9rie assez bien partag\u00e9e, est un spectacle de qualit\u00e9 dont nos sens \u00e9blouis ne doivent pas se lasser. La fin de notre monde si satisfait de lui-m\u00eame n’est pas avare d’effets de manche et d’envol\u00e9es th\u00e9\u00e2trales. Pas question de s’ennuyer.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 28 septembre 2006 \u00e0 10H04<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
On poss\u00e8de une illustration assez \u00e9difiante du degr\u00e9 de d\u00e9sordre qu’a atteint le d\u00e9bat politique sur l’Irak \u00e0 Washington avec l’article de Robert Scheer, A War on Intelligence, sur Truthdig.com du 26 septembre. Autant le texte de Scheer que les commentaires mis en ligne par les lecteurs doivent \u00eatre lus. On y d\u00e9couvre toutes les… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[3066,3356,857,5085,5945,610],"class_list":["post-68042","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-americaniste","tag-desordre","tag-irak","tag-nie","tag-scheer","tag-virtualisme"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68042","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68042"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68042\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68042"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68042"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68042"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}