{"id":68062,"date":"2006-10-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-10-03T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/10\/03\/budget-dod-the-house-of-war-est-en-train-de-devenir-la-maison-des-fous\/"},"modified":"2006-10-03T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-10-03T00:00:00","slug":"budget-dod-the-house-of-war-est-en-train-de-devenir-la-maison-des-fous","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/10\/03\/budget-dod-the-house-of-war-est-en-train-de-devenir-la-maison-des-fous\/","title":{"rendered":"Budget DoD : \u201cthe House of War<\/em>\u201d est en train de devenir la maison des fous"},"content":{"rendered":"

Les derni\u00e8res d\u00e9cisions prises par le Congr\u00e8s parti en vacances pr\u00e9-\u00e9lectorales commencent \u00e0 faire ressembler le processus budg\u00e9taire du Pentagone au sc\u00e9nario commun d\u00e9velopp\u00e9 au sein d’un \u00e9tablissement psychiatrique frapp\u00e9 d’hyst\u00e9rie en plus des affections courantes du domaine. Dans son num\u00e9ro du 2 octobre, Defense News<\/em> qualifie ces derni\u00e8res d\u00e9cisions de cette fa\u00e7on : \u00aba last-minute paroxysm of election-year politicking<\/em>\u00bb. (La qualification allait \u00e0 une d\u00e9cision de derni\u00e8re minute ajoutant $2,1 milliards au $70 milliards du programme C-17, pour ajouter dix C-17 que l’USAF ne demandait pas. Cette commande suppl\u00e9mentaire permettra \u00e0 la ligne de production de Boeing de continuer \u00e0 tourner.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe budget du Pentagone est effectivement en train de devenir fou apr\u00e8s avoir \u00e9chapp\u00e9 \u00e0 tout contr\u00f4le, avec un ex\u00e9cutif impuissant, divis\u00e9, sans la moindre coh\u00e9sion, avec des services plaidant eux-m\u00eames, hors du contr\u00f4le de leurs autorit\u00e9s, leurs budgets aupr\u00e8s des organismes o\u00f9 ils ont leurs entr\u00e9es (l’OMB, le Congr\u00e8s, etc.), avec un Congr\u00e8s compl\u00e8tement irresponsable et plong\u00e9 dans la hantise des \u00e9lections et du financement des \u00e9lections.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe m\u00eame<\/a> Defense News<\/em> observe, d’une fa\u00e7on g\u00e9n\u00e9rale :<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abThe U.S. military is on track to spend almost $600 billion in 2007 more than at any time since World War II, according to inflation-adjusted Pentagon budget data. Still, service chiefs insist, that’s not enough to meet their wartime needs.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbBefore departing for a six-week election recess, Congress approved a $532.8 billon defense spending bill, including $70 billion to fight the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. In addition, President George W. Bush has signaled plans to ask for another $60 billion in emergency funding next spring for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tConcernant ces derniers $60 milliards qui devraient \u00eatre demand\u00e9s au printemps 2007, des sources europ\u00e9ennes \u00e0 Washington nous signalent qu’en fait cette demande serait faite d\u00e8s novembre, apr\u00e8s les \u00e9lections bien s\u00fbr. Et une nouvelle<\/strong> demande, d’un montant \u00e9quivalent (autour de $50 milliards) pourrait \u00eatre introduite au printemps 2007. A ce rythme, il appara\u00eet de plus en plus \u00e9vident que les \u00e9valuations les plus sensationnelles (jusqu’\u00e0 $2.000 milliards pour la seule guerre contre la terreur en dix ans) devraient \u00eatre largement d\u00e9pass\u00e9es.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tThe House of War<\/em>? (Titre du livre de James Carroll<\/a>.) Tr\u00e8s vite, on dira : The House of Mad<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 3 octobre 2006 \u00e0 12H48<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Les derni\u00e8res d\u00e9cisions prises par le Congr\u00e8s parti en vacances pr\u00e9-\u00e9lectorales commencent \u00e0 faire ressembler le processus budg\u00e9taire du Pentagone au sc\u00e9nario commun d\u00e9velopp\u00e9 au sein d’un \u00e9tablissement psychiatrique frapp\u00e9 d’hyst\u00e9rie en plus des affections courantes du domaine. Dans son num\u00e9ro du 2 octobre, Defense News qualifie ces derni\u00e8res d\u00e9cisions de cette fa\u00e7on : \u00aba… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5963,3127,3369,3285,568,5962],"class_list":["post-68062","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-5963","tag-budget","tag-carroll","tag-congres","tag-dod","tag-fous"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68062","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68062"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68062\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68062"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68062"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68062"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}