{"id":68076,"date":"2006-10-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-10-07T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/10\/07\/la-secession-aux-usa-un-interet-grandissant\/"},"modified":"2006-10-07T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-10-07T00:00:00","slug":"la-secession-aux-usa-un-interet-grandissant","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/10\/07\/la-secession-aux-usa-un-interet-grandissant\/","title":{"rendered":"La s\u00e9cession aux USA : un int\u00e9r\u00eat grandissant"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><h2 class=\"titleset_b.deepblue\" style=\"color:#0f3955;font-size:1.65em;font-variant:small-caps;\">La s\u00e9cession aux USA : un int\u00e9r\u00eat grandissant<\/h2>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>On sait le Vermont tr\u00e8s activiste sur la question. Il n&rsquo;est donc pas \u00e9tonnant que ce soit un des leaders s\u00e9cessionnistes du <a class=\"gen\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dedefensa.org\/article.php?art_id=1387\">Vermont<\/a>, Thomas Taylor, qui affirme : &laquo;<em>Not since the end of the Civil War has there been this much interest in political independence by the states.<\/em>&raquo; En conclusion du texte qu&rsquo;il publie sur le sujet (sur le site de <em>CounterPunch<\/em>, en date du <a class=\"gen\" href=\"http:\/\/www.counterpunch.org\/sale10052006.html\">5 octobre<\/a>), Kirkpatrick Sale \u00e9crit : &laquo;<em>It may be too much to say, as Thomas Naylor has said recently, that \u00ab\u00a0once again secession fever is spreading across America just as it did back in 1776 and 1861.\u00a0\u00bb But there is no doubt that something is in the air, and the November convention will be the barometer of just how strong and purposive this movement is.<\/em>&raquo;<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Kirkpatrick Sale pr\u00e9sente dans son texte la premi\u00e8re <em>North American Secessionist Convention<\/em>, qui r\u00e9unira en novembre prochain une trentaine de d\u00e9l\u00e9gu\u00e9s et des observateurs de diff\u00e9rents mouvements s\u00e9cessionnistes. (Outre divers Etats du Sud &mdash; vieux souvenir et \u00e9vidence historique &mdash; on trouve de ces mouvements dans le Vermont, en Alaska, \u00e0 Hawa\u00efi, dans le Maine, le New Hampshire, le Michigan, etc.)<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Ce rassemblement semble d\u00e9risoire par le volume et le poids des associations ou personnes qu&rsquo;il attire, et \u00e0 la fois fort de potentialit\u00e9s exceptionnelles. En un sens, on dirait que le syst\u00e8me, avec son gouvernement central, a int\u00e9r\u00eat \u00e0 tr\u00e8s vite trouver une formule qui le r\u00e9habilite peu ou prou aux yeux des citoyens s&rsquo;il ne veut pas que des r\u00e9flexions marginales et des tentations \u00e9pisodiques deviennent centrales et substantielles. Les USA sont, apr\u00e8s 6 ans de Bush\/post-9\/11, au bout de l&rsquo;\u00e9puisement de toutes les possibilit\u00e9s normales d&rsquo;opposition, sans aucun effet concret sur une \u00ab\u00a0gouvernance\u00a0\u00bb (comme on dit aujourd&rsquo;hui) exceptionnellement nihiliste, corrompue, m\u00e9diocre et substantiellement pr\u00e9datrice. Si les \u00e9lections de <em>mid-term<\/em>, dramatis\u00e9es comme elles le sont, ne suscitent pas l&rsquo;amorce d&rsquo;un tel changement, la r\u00e9flexion s\u00e9cessionniste prendra son essor. Il s&rsquo;agit d&rsquo;une logique vitale : la t\u00eate s&rsquo;av\u00e9rant irr\u00e9m\u00e9diablement pourrie et mena\u00e7ant les constituants de sa propre pand\u00e9mie, les constituants vont songer \u00e0 leur s\u00e9curit\u00e9 sanitaire, c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire \u00e0 leurs propres destins.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>A noter cette remarque de Sale, suivant la remarque de Naylor d\u00e9j\u00e0 cit\u00e9e, particuli\u00e8rement int\u00e9ressante pour un francophone (soulign\u00e9 en gras par nous) : &laquo;<em>It seems clear evidence, as Vermont&rsquo;s Thomas Naylor says, that \u00ab\u00a0not since the end of the Civil War has there been this much interest in political independence by the states.\u00a0\u00bb (I&rsquo;ll have to remind him that<\/em> <strong><em>it was not a civil war but a war of secession<\/em><\/strong>, <em>quite a different thing.)<\/em>&raquo; Sale donne donc raison \u00e0 la description fran\u00e7aise de l&rsquo;\u00e9v\u00e9nement (\u00ab\u00a0Guerre de S\u00e9cession\u00a0\u00bb) contre l&rsquo;expression am\u00e9ricaniste (\u00ab\u00a0<em>Civil War<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Mais on comprend pourquoi la formule am\u00e9ricaniste a toujours \u00e9t\u00e9 \u00ab\u00a0<em>Civil War<\/em>\u00a0\u00bb : c&rsquo;est nier par le langage &mdash; c&rsquo;est-\u00e0-dire l&rsquo;essentiel &mdash; la r\u00e9alit\u00e9 horrible (pour l&rsquo;am\u00e9ricanisme) de la possibilit\u00e9 de la s\u00e9cession. De m\u00eame, pr\u00e9caution suppl\u00e9mentaire au prix d&rsquo;une grossi\u00e8re faute d&rsquo;une grammaire ainsi sacrifi\u00e9e au symbolisme sentimental, le terme \u00ab\u00a0USA\u00a0\u00bb (<em>United States of America<\/em>) passe dans le langage courant, \u00e0 partir de 1865 et de la reddition de Lee \u00e0 Appotamox, du pluriel (\u00ab\u00a0<em>The US are&hellip;<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0) au singulier (\u00ab\u00a0<em>the US is&hellip;<\/em>\u00ab\u00a0).<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><p>Mis en ligne le 7 octobre 2006 \u00e0 15H58<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>La s\u00e9cession aux USA : un int\u00e9r\u00eat grandissant On sait le Vermont tr\u00e8s activiste sur la question. Il n&rsquo;est donc pas \u00e9tonnant que ce soit un des leaders s\u00e9cessionnistes du Vermont, Thomas Taylor, qui affirme : &laquo;Not since the end of the Civil War has there been this much interest in political independence by the&hellip;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5017,3410,2949,3014,2804,4462],"class_list":["post-68076","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-centre","tag-sale","tag-secession","tag-systeme","tag-usa","tag-vermont"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68076","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68076"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68076\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68076"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68076"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68076"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}