se d\u00e9t\u00e9riore<\/a> avec une imp\u00e9riale r\u00e9gularit\u00e9.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00abParticipation in the development of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) exposes the Netherlands to financial risks. The cost per aircraft still cannot be calculated. Development costs have risen by more than 80% since 1996. There is no insight into the further development of costs because 65% of the test phase must still be completed. In 1999 the Ministry of Defence calculated that the project would cost at least NLG 10 billion (more than EUR 4.5 billion) if 114 aircraft were procured. The latest calculation, based on 85 aircraft over 30 years, is EUR 14.6 billion. But the figure might turn out to be higher. These findings are presented in a monitoring report the Court of Audit submitted to the House of Representatives today.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe Court of Audit does not express an opinion on whether participation in the JSF programme should be continued or not. It is not the Court’s task to do so; that is a political decision.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t()<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\t\u00bbThe audit departments of the Ministry of Defence and the Ministry of Economic Affairs informed the House of Representatives in 2005 that there were many uncertainties regarding the various phases of this major project. They recommended that a clearer distinction be made between the development phase and the procurement phase. The House of Representatives has not taken any further decision on the matter.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe US Government Accountability Office concluded last year that the entire JSF programme should be reassessed. It advised the US Congress to postpone the approval and allocation of funds until more was known and test flights had been carried out.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbIn the Netherlands, too, the supply of information to the House of Representatives is open to improvement. The House itself should state what its requirements are in this respect. It was already known in 2002 that development costs might still have to be paid during the production phase. The start and end points of the various phases are still uncertain and this might lead to higher costs.<\/em> <\/p>\n<\/p>\n\t\u00bbThe Court of Audit also notes that at present there is still no insight into the size of payments made to the government by Dutch enterprises that will make money on the production orders. The Court of Audit draws the House of Representatives’ attention to the cost control risks of this project.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
\tMis en ligne le 12 octobre 2006 \u00e0 12H57<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Normalement, disons d’apr\u00e8s les consignes les plus optimistes, tout devait se passer comme ceci : l’actuel gouvernement n\u00e9erlandais lib\u00e9ral de droite, minoritaire et d\u00e9missionnaire avant les \u00e9lections anticip\u00e9es de novembre prochain, devait tout faire pour faire figurer l’engagement n\u00e9erlandais dans le programme JSF dans les affaires courantes, et effectivement signer cet engagement. C’est imp\u00e9ratif parce… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[5996,3055,2604,5997,3203,250],"class_list":["post-68092","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-comptes","tag-cour","tag-des","tag-engagement","tag-hollande","tag-jsf"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68092","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68092"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68092\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68092"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68092"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68092"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}