{"id":68124,"date":"2006-10-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2006-10-22T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/10\/22\/les-neocons-nous-la-jouent-desormais-dans-le-registre-sagesse-condescendante-et-scepticisme\/"},"modified":"2006-10-22T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2006-10-22T00:00:00","slug":"les-neocons-nous-la-jouent-desormais-dans-le-registre-sagesse-condescendante-et-scepticisme","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/2006\/10\/22\/les-neocons-nous-la-jouent-desormais-dans-le-registre-sagesse-condescendante-et-scepticisme\/","title":{"rendered":"Les \u201cneocons<\/em>\u201d nous la jouent d\u00e9sormais dans le registre sagesse condescendante et scepticisme"},"content":{"rendered":"

Quelle est l’attitude des n\u00e9o-conservateurs devant le d\u00e9cha\u00eenement de la crise irakienne cette fois \u00e0 Washington (et \u00e0 Londres), aussi violente en un sens, quoique d’une autre sorte de violence, que sur le th\u00e9\u00e2tre des op\u00e9rations ? L’attitude est plus discr\u00e8te que ce qu’on a connu d’eux et paradoxalement mesur\u00e9e. Les n\u00e9o-conservateurs se posent d\u00e9sormais presque en mod\u00e9r\u00e9s : puissamment sceptiques, certes, mais avec une touche de sagesse d\u00e9senchant\u00e9e. L’argument va de soi : puisqu’on ne veut plus de notre strat\u00e9gie (guerre \u00e0 outrance), voyons ce qu’on propose \u00e0 la place ; notre jugement est pour le moins sceptique.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLes n\u00e9o-conservateurs jouent avec une maestria consomm\u00e9e de ces vertus de la politique virtualiste postmoderne : irresponsabilit\u00e9 et incons\u00e9quence, comme s’ils les poss\u00e9daient naturellement. C’est le cas. Leur inspiration est la cause directe du d\u00e9sordre extraordinaire qu’on constate aujourd’hui en Irak, et, par cons\u00e9quent, du d\u00e9sordre \u00e0 Washington et \u00e0 Londres. Cela ne tient aucun r\u00f4le dans leur prise de position puisqu’ils condamnent de facto<\/em> ce d\u00e9sordre et les r\u00e9actions \u00e0 ce d\u00e9sordre. La m\u00e9moire si courte qu’elle implique le refus de la m\u00e9moire est la clef de tout.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\tLe Times<\/em> rapporte aujourd’hui<\/a> ces jugements de n\u00e9o-conservateurs.<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00abRichard Perle, a leading neoconservative, said the influence of the Baker group on the administration was overstated: I don’t believe Bush will agree to the proposals they are rumoured to be mulling over. He has two years left as president and he is not going to hand in the towel and pass responsibility to a commission.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbHe warned that the fate of Iraq was unlikely to be decided in America: The hope is that a political leadership will emerge in Iraq that can calm the situation and I don’t know how we can help with that. So far we’ve been picking the leaders, such as Maliki, and we’re not necessarily the best judges.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/p>\n

\t\u00bbEliot Cohen, another prominent neoconservative, argued in The Wall Street Journal last week that all the Plan Bs for Iraq were so flawed that he would quietly endorse a coup by a junta of military modernisers. It would involve, he admitted, a substantial repast of crow for the Bush administration an American expression for eating humble pie.<\/em>\u00bb<\/p>\n<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\tMis en ligne le 22 octobre 2006 \u00e0 08H55<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Quelle est l’attitude des n\u00e9o-conservateurs devant le d\u00e9cha\u00eenement de la crise irakienne cette fois \u00e0 Washington (et \u00e0 Londres), aussi violente en un sens, quoique d’une autre sorte de violence, que sur le th\u00e9\u00e2tre des op\u00e9rations ? L’attitude est plus discr\u00e8te que ce qu’on a connu d’eux et paradoxalement mesur\u00e9e. Les n\u00e9o-conservateurs se posent d\u00e9sormais… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"","ping_status":"","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[4330,857,1104,3213],"class_list":["post-68124","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bloc-notes","tag-abrams","tag-irak","tag-neocons","tag-perle"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68124","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=68124"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/68124\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=68124"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=68124"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/new.dedefensa.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=68124"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}